The Health Care Case the Supreme Court's decision and its implications

The Supreme Court's decision in the Health Care Case, NFIB v. Sebelius, gripped the nation's attention during the spring of 2012. No one could have predicted the strange coalition of justices and arguments that would eventually lead the Court to uphold the Act's principal provisions....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: New York Oxford University Press 2013, 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Oxford University Press - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 01875nmm a2200301 u 4500
001 EB000726341
003 EBX01000000000000000579423
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 180413 ||| eng
020 |a 9780199344888 
050 4 |a KF3605 
100 1 |a Persily, Nathaniel  |e [editor of compilation] 
245 0 0 |a The Health Care Case  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b the Supreme Court's decision and its implications  |c Nathaniel Persily, Gillian E. Metzger, and Trevor W. Morrison 
260 |a New York  |b Oxford University Press  |c 2013, 2013 
300 |a 1 online resource 
505 0 |a Includes bibliographical references and index 
610 1 4 |a United States / Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 
653 |a National health insurance / Law and legislation / United States 
653 |a Health insurance / United States 
653 |a Health care reform / United States / History 
700 1 |a Metzger, Gillian E.  |e [editor of compilation] 
700 1 |a Morrison, Trevor W.  |e [editor of compilation] 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b OUP  |a Oxford University Press 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199301058.001.0001?nosfx=y  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 344.73022 
520 |a The Supreme Court's decision in the Health Care Case, NFIB v. Sebelius, gripped the nation's attention during the spring of 2012. No one could have predicted the strange coalition of justices and arguments that would eventually lead the Court to uphold the Act's principal provisions. When the Supreme Court delivered its complicated and fractured decision, it offered new interpretations to four different clauses in the Constitution. This volume gathers together reactions to the decision from an ideologically diverse selection of the nation's leading scholars of constitutional, administrative, and health law