Leibniz and the Kabbalah

The general view of scholars is that the Kabbalah had no meaningful influence on Leibniz's thought. } But on the basis of new evidence I am convinced that the question must be reopened. The Kabbalah did influence Leibniz, and a recognition of this will lead to both a better understanding of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Coudert, A.P.
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 1995, 1995
Edition:1st ed. 1995
Series:International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Springer Book Archives -2004 - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02846nmm a2200301 u 4500
001 EB000722418
003 EBX01000000000000000575500
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 140122 ||| eng
020 |a 9789401720694 
100 1 |a Coudert, A.P. 
245 0 0 |a Leibniz and the Kabbalah  |h Elektronische Ressource  |c by A.P. Coudert 
250 |a 1st ed. 1995 
260 |a Dordrecht  |b Springer Netherlands  |c 1995, 1995 
300 |a XVIII, 226 p  |b online resource 
505 0 |a 1. A Brief Historiography of Leibniz Studies -- 2. Van Helmont, Leibniz, and the Kabbalah -- 3. Leibniz and van Helmont: Their Friendship and Collaboration -- 4. The Kabbalah and Monads -- 5. The Kabbalah and Freedom and Determinism -- 6. The Kabbalah and Leibniz’s Theodicy -- 7. Causation, Language, and the Kabbalah -- Conclusion -- Notes 
653 |a Philosophy, Modern 
653 |a Early Modern Philosophy 
653 |a History 
653 |a Religion 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b SBA  |a Springer Book Archives -2004 
490 0 |a International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées 
028 5 0 |a 10.1007/978-94-017-2069-4 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2069-4?nosfx=y  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 190.903 
520 |a The general view of scholars is that the Kabbalah had no meaningful influence on Leibniz's thought. } But on the basis of new evidence I am convinced that the question must be reopened. The Kabbalah did influence Leibniz, and a recognition of this will lead to both a better understanding of the supposed "quirkiness,,2 of Leibniz's philosophy and an appreciation ofthe Kabbalah as an integral but hitherto ignored factor in the emergence of the modem secular and scientifically oriented world. During the past twenty years there has been increasing willingness to recognize the important ways in which mystical and occult thinking contributed to the development of science and the emergence 3 of toleration. However, the Kabbalah, particularly the Lurianic Kabbalah with its monistic vitalism and optimistic philosophy of perfectionism and universal salvation, has not yet been integrated into the new historiography, although it richly deserves to be. On the basis of manuscripts in libraries at Hanover and Wolfenbiittel, it is clear that Leibniz's relationship with Francis Mercury van Helmont (1614- 1698) and Christian Knorr von Rosenroth (1636-1689), the two leading Christian Kabbalists of the period, was much closer than previously imagined and that his direct knowledge of their writings, especially the collection of 4 kabbalistic texts they published in the Kabbala Denudata, was far more detailed than most scholars have realized. During 1688 Leibniz spent more than a month at Sulzbach with von Rosenroth