|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
03269nmm a2200301 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000715645 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000568727 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
140122 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9789401027601
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Hardwick, C.D.
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Faith and Objectivity
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b Fritz Buri and the Hermeneutical Foundations of a Radical Theology
|c by C.D. Hardwick
|
| 250 |
|
|
|a 1st ed. 1972
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Dordrecht
|b Springer Netherlands
|c 1972, 1972
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 295 p
|b online resource
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a I. The Problem of Objectivity in the Genesis of Buri’s Theology -- A. Consistent Eschatology and Philosophy of Religion: Buri’s Early Position -- B. Objectivity and Self-Understanding: The Transition to Buri’s Mature Position -- I The Problem of Objectivity in the Foundations of a Theological Hermeneutic -- II. The Theological Problem of Objectivity and Non-Objectivity -- III. The Non-Objectivity of Faith and Revelation -- IV. Symbol, Myth, and the Dialectic of Objectivity and Nonobjectivity -- II The Problem of Objectivity in the Implementation of the Hermeneutical Principles -- V. Historicity and the Systematic Principle in the Interpretation of Doctrines -- VI. Existentialist Interpretation and Objective Description -- VII. Radical Theology and the Problem of Objectivity
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Religion—Philosophy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Religion and Education
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Philosophy of Religion
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Cognitive psychology
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Cognitive Psychology
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Church and education
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b SBA
|a Springer Book Archives -2004
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2760-1?nosfx=y
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 210
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a In the last decade, too many American theologians have been preoc cupied with charting and interpreting in a superficial manner the move ments of the newest stars in the Continental theological firmament. This preoccupation contributed much, unfortunately, to that faddism that was so characteristic of American theology in the Sixties, the period imme diately following the passing of a generation of theological giants like Barth, Bultmann, Tillich, Gogarten, and the Niebuhrs. There has seldom been a period in which so many promissory notes were issued so care lessly onto the intellectual market, notes that were not, and perhaps could not, have been redeemed. Given this temper of the times, it is difficult to account for the almost total neglect of the work of Professor Fritz Burl of Basel, whose "theolo gy of existence" is one of the most interesting and impressive contempo rary attempts to interpret the myths and symbols of the Christian faith in terms of an existentialist philosophy. Even if one were to apply that most superficial, though for many apparently decisive, criterion of "radicality," one might have expected his work to attract some sustained attention be cause Buri has consistently posed a radical solution to most of the hotly debated issues of the times: the problem of demythologization, the mean ing of theological language, the problems raised by historical criticism, and the meaning of the historical Jesus for faith, to mention a few
|