|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
03034nmm a2200265 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000674149 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000527231 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
140122 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9783642780172
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Engemann, Rainer
|e [editor]
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Intestinal Anastomoses with Bioabsorbable Anastomosis Rings
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b Proceedings of the First European Workshop
|c edited by Rainer Engemann, Arnulf Thiede
|
| 250 |
|
|
|a 1st ed. 1993
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Berlin, Heidelberg
|b Springer Berlin Heidelberg
|c 1993, 1993
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a XI, 96 p. 30 illus
|b online resource
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a An Experimental Study in Pigs -- The Application of Special Instruments with the Bioabsorbable Anastomosis Ring: Technology and Technical Aspects -- Standardized X-Ray Examination of the Bioabsorbable Ring Anastomosis -- Clinical Application of the Bioabsorbable Anastomosis Ring in Gastrointestinal Surgery I -- Multicentre European Prospective Randomized Trial of the Valtrac Bioabsorbable Anastomosis Ring -- Prospective Trial of the Bioabsorbable Anastomosis Ring in Gastrointestinal Surgery -- Prospective Study of Results and Complications in 304 Bioabsorbable Ring Anastomoses in the Upper and Lower Gastrointestinal Tract -- Clinical Application of the Bioabsorbable Anastomosis Ring in Gastrointestinal Surgery II -- Occlusion Ileus Due to Blood Clots Following Right Hemicolectomy: A Rare Complication -- Experience with the Bioabsorbable Valtrac Ring in Small
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Surgery
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Surgery
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Thiede, Arnulf
|e [editor]
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b SBA
|a Springer Book Archives -2004
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78017-2?nosfx=y
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 617
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a The anastomotic technique plays a predominant role in gastrointestinal surgery. A feared complication is leakage due to the sutures. Such leakage cannot be detected early; consequently, infection spreads locally and systemically. An anastomotic method is generally evaluated according to its rate of leakage, related to the localization, bur real scientific comparisons, i.e., controlled studies, are almost totally lack ing. The criteria of evaluation include the type of suture, the localization, the auxiliary technical tools, practicability, the different forms of wound healing, angiogenesis, and vascularization, among others. The postoperative criteria are complications shortly after surgery, such as bleeding, ruptures, and stenoses of the anastomosis. A standard comparison is made difficult by the variety of cytophysiological and biochemical factors that influence wound healing. In the comparison of larger series one must always take into account differences of auxiliary tools, strategies, and inhomogeneity of patients. A change of one auxiliary tool or of one strategy implies the modification of various target criteria. Often enough, however, one does not sufficiently consider the surgeon's most. important role
|