|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
03212nmm a2200313 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000662753 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000515835 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
140122 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9783642503252
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Eymann, Angelika
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Consumers’ Spatial Choice Behavior
|h Elektronische Ressource
|c by Angelika Eymann
|
| 250 |
|
|
|a 1st ed. 1995
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Heidelberg
|b Physica
|c 1995, 1995
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a XII, 192 p
|b online resource
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a 1 Introduction -- 2 Microeconomic Essentials -- 2.1 The Standard Neoclassical Model -- 2.2 Household Production Models -- 2.3 Are goods what are thought of as goods? -- 2.4 Zero Consumption -- 2.5 Households -- 3 Microeconometric Modeling -- 3.1 Discrete Choice Models -- 3.2 Alternative Model Specifications -- 3.3 Judging the Quality of Model Specifications -- 3.4 Discrete-Continuous Choice Models -- 3.5 The Generation of Choice Sets -- 3.6 Spatial Choice Models -- 3.7 Predicting Unobservable Prices -- 4 An Empirical Analysis of Tourism Demand -- 4.1 The Role of the Tourist Industry -- 4.2 Microeconomic Models of Tourists’ Behavior -- 4.3 The Choice Set of Tourists -- 4.4 Microeconometric Models of Tourists’ Demand -- 4.5 Empirical Results -- 5 Concluding Remarks -- A Details to the Empirical Applications -- A.1 Data Sources -- A.2 Explanations to the Tables
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Regional and Spatial Economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Spatial economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Regional economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Quantitative Economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Econometrics
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b SBA
|a Springer Book Archives -2004
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a International Economics and Institutions
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.1007/978-3-642-50325-2
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50325-2?nosfx=y
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330.9
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Migration, commuting, and tourism are prominent phenomena demonstrating the political and economic relevance of the spatial choice behavior of households. The identification of the determinants and effects of the households' location choice is necessary for both entrepreneurial and policy planners who attempt to predict (or regulate) the future demand for location-specific commodities, such as infrastructure, land, or housing, and the supply of labor. Microeconomic studies of the spatial behavior of individuals have typically focused upon the demand for a single, homogeneous, yet location-specific com 2 modity (such as land! or housing ) or their supply of labor3 and investigated the formation of location-specific prices and wages in the presence of transportation and migration costs or analyzed the individual-and location-specific character istics triggering spatial rather than quantitative or temporal adjustments. In contrast to many theoretical analyses, empirical studies of the causes or con sequences of individual demand for location-specific commodities have often considered several "brands" of a heterogeneous good that are offered at various locations, are perfect substitutes, and may be produced by varying production 4 technologies. lCf. Alonso (1964) 2Cf. Muth (1969). 3Cf. Sjaastad (1962) and Greenwood (1975)
|