|
|
|
|
LEADER |
04163nmm a2200301 u 4500 |
001 |
EB000652255 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000000505337 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
140122 ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9783540247692
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Oquendo, Flavio
|e [editor]
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Software Architecture
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b First European Workshop, EWSA 2004, St Andrews, UK, May 21-22, 2004, Proceedings
|c edited by Flavio Oquendo, Brian Warboys, Ron Morrison
|
250 |
|
|
|a 1st ed. 2004
|
260 |
|
|
|a Berlin, Heidelberg
|b Springer Berlin Heidelberg
|c 2004, 2004
|
300 |
|
|
|a IX, 283 p
|b online resource
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Research Papers -- Sotograph – A Pragmatic Approach to Source Code Architecture Conformance Checking -- Formal Analysis of Architectural Patterns -- Architectural Modelling in Product Family Context -- Reflection-Based, Aspect-Oriented Software Architecture -- Software Architecture Evolution through Dynamic AOP -- On the Role of Architectural Style in Model Driven Development -- UML 1.4 versus UML 2.0 as Languages to Describe Software Architectures -- From Acme to CORBA: Bridging the Gap -- Constraints of Behavioural Inheritance -- Experience Papers -- Software Architectures for Designing Virtual Reality Applications -- Generation and Enactment of Controllers for Business Architectures Using MDA -- Formalization of an HCI Style for Accelerator Restart Monitoring -- Experiences Using Viewpoints for Information Systems Architecture: An Industrial Experience Report -- Position Papers -- Software Architecture: The Next Step -- Using Architectural Models at Runtime: Research Challenges -- Maintainability through Architecture Development -- An Architecture Description Language for Mobile Distributed Systems -- Model Checking for Software Architectures -- Distilling Scenarios from Patterns for Software Architecture Evaluation – A Position Paper -- Invited Papers: European Projects in Software Architecture -- Towards an MDA-Based Development Methodology -- Correct Development of Embedded Systems -- Expressing Domain Variability for Configuration -- ArchWare: Architecting Evolvable Software -- The FABRIC Project
|
653 |
|
|
|a Software engineering
|
653 |
|
|
|a Software Engineering
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Warboys, Brian
|e [editor]
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Morrison, Ron
|e [editor]
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b SBA
|a Springer Book Archives -2004
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a Lecture Notes in Computer Science
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.1007/b97879
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://doi.org/10.1007/b97879?nosfx=y
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 005.1
|
520 |
|
|
|a The last decade has been one of great progress in the field of software architecture research and practice. Software architecture has emerged as an important subdis- pline of software engineering. A key aspect of the design of any software system is its architecture, i. e. the fundamental organization of a system embodied in its com- nents, their relationships to each other, and to the environment, and the principles guiding its design and evolution (as defined in the Recommended Practice for Arc- tectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems -- IEEE Std 1471-2000). - The First European Workshop on Software Architecture (EWSA 2004) provided an international forum for researchers and practitioners from academia and industry to discuss a wide range of topics in the area of software architecture, and to jointly f- mulate an agenda for future research in this field. EWSA 2004 distinguished among three types of papers: research papers (which describe authors’ novel research work), experience papers (which describe real-world experiences related to software architectures), and position papers (which present concise arguments about a topic of software architecture research or practice). The Program Committee selected 19 papers (9 research papers, 4 experience - pers, and 6 position papers) out of 48 submissions from 16 countries (Australia, B- zil, Canada, Chile, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, The Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, UK, USA). All submissions were reviewed by three members of the Program Committee
|