Biological Abstracts / BIOSIS The First Fifty Years. The Evolution of a Major Science Information Service

A fiftieth birthday is a good one to celebrate-old enough to be ex­ perienced and mature, but not so old as to be an antique. And if the fifty years have spanned as much change in scientific affairs as has occurred during the lifetime of Biological Abstracts it is surely time for a stocktaking. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Steere, William (Editor)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: New York, NY Springer US 1976, 1976
Edition:1st ed. 1976
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Springer Book Archives -2004 - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 03187nmm a2200289 u 4500
001 EB000628220
003 EBX01000000000000000481302
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 140122 ||| eng
020 |a 9781468422351 
100 1 |a Steere, William  |e [editor] 
245 0 0 |a Biological Abstracts / BIOSIS  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b The First Fifty Years. The Evolution of a Major Science Information Service  |c edited by William Steere 
250 |a 1st ed. 1976 
260 |a New York, NY  |b Springer US  |c 1976, 1976 
300 |a XVIII, 233 p  |b online resource 
505 0 |a 1 Landmarks and Milestones in the History of Biological Abstracts/BIOSIS -- 2 The Historical Origins of Biological Abstracts, Precursors-1917–1925 Botanical Abstracts and Abstracts of Bacteriology -- 3 The Founding of Biological Abstracts, The Concept and the Publication -- 4 Coexistence with a Time Bomb -- 5 The Years of Crisis -- 6 Consolidation and Growth, The Introduction of Electronic Data Processing -- 7 The Computerization of Biological Abstracts -- 8 The Mechanization of Biological AbstractslBIOSIS -- 9 Planning for the Next Fifty Years -- 10 Housing Biological Abstracts for a Half-Century -- 11 Biological Abstracts/BIOSIS as a Leader in National and International Cooperation -- 12 The Trustees of Biological Abstracts, 1927–1976 -- References 
653 |a Humanities and Social Sciences 
653 |a Humanities 
653 |a Social sciences 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b SBA  |a Springer Book Archives -2004 
028 5 0 |a 10.1007/978-1-4684-2235-1 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2235-1?nosfx=y  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 001.3 
082 0 |a 300 
520 |a A fiftieth birthday is a good one to celebrate-old enough to be ex­ perienced and mature, but not so old as to be an antique. And if the fifty years have spanned as much change in scientific affairs as has occurred during the lifetime of Biological Abstracts it is surely time for a stocktaking. The leaders of biology in 1926 simply could not have imagined the condi­ tions of 1976. And few biologists active in 1976 can imagine what 1926 was like. That was before the explosive growth of federal funds for research and development, before the huge swelling of graduate enrollments and degrees, before World War II, even before the Great Depression! A few old-timers can remember 1926, and Bill Steere will forgive me for calling him an old-timer. After all, he provides the evidence himself; as a graduate student he met the first editor when Biological Abstracts was only three years old, and he has known all its later editors and administra­ tive officers. What he does not say is that tn length of service to BIOSIS, in seniority, he stands among only a few past and present members of the board of trustees; nor does he mention that at least as frequently as any other biologist he has been called upon to serve on governmental and associational councils and committees dealing with policy and strategy concerning the abstracting, classification, and dissemination of scientific knowledge. Surely he was the right choice to write this history