Compelled Compassion Government Intervention in the Treatment of Critically Ill Newborns

In April 1982, an infant boy was born in Bloomington, Indiana, with Down syndrome and a defective, but surgically correctable, esophagus. His parents refused to consent to surgery or intravenous feeding. The hospital unsuccessfully sought a court order to force treatment, and appeals to higher court...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caplan, Arthur L., Blank, Robert H. (Author), Merrick, Janna C. (Author)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Totowa, NJ Humana 1992, 1992
Edition:1st ed. 1992
Series:Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Springer Book Archives -2004 - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
Table of Contents:
  • Life-and-Death Decisions in the Midst of Uncertainty
  • Conflict, Compromise, and Symbolism: The Politics of the Baby Doe Debate
  • A Legal Analysis of the Child Abuse Amendments of 1984
  • Hard Cases Make Bad Law: The Legacy of the Baby Doe Controversy
  • Parental Perspectives on Treatment-Nontreatment Decisions Involving Newborns with Spina Bifida
  • Rationing Medicine in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)
  • Baby Doe and Me: A Personal Journey
  • Baby Doe and Forgoing Life-Sustaining Treatment: Compassion, Discrimination, or Medical Neglect?
  • Neonatologists, Pediatricians, and the Supreme Court Criticize the “Baby Doe” Regulations
  • The Impact of the Child Abuse Amendments on Nursing Staff and Their Care of Handicapped Newborns
  • Infant Care Review Committees in the Aftermath of Baby Doe
  • Decision Making in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: The Impact of the 1984 Child Abuse Amendments
  • Appendix: Chronology of Events Related to Passage of the 1984 Child Abuse Amendments
  • Biographies