The Triennial Act impartially stated Shewing, I. That the law was made for securing the liberties of the people, by the frequent calling of parliaments chosen by them: and is now become a fundamental part of our constitution not to be violated on slight pretences. II. That the many plausible arguments insinuated for repealing this act, are fallacious and inconclusive, and the consequences thereof may be fatal to the publick
| Format: | eBook |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
London
Printed for J. Grantham near St. Paul's Church-Yard
1716, 1716
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Collection: | Eighteenth Century Collections Online / ECCO - Collection details see MPG.ReNa |
| Item Description: | English Short Title Catalog, T56991. - Goldsmiths', 5332. - Reproduction of original from University of London's Goldsmiths' Library. - Sometimes attributed to Daniel Defoe, but denied by him in 'Mercurius Politicus', July 1717. - With a half-title and a final errata leaf |
|---|---|
| Physical Description: | Online-Ressource ([4],30,[2]p) 8° |