Similar Items

• Edward Holden Cruttenden Esq; and John Zephaniah Holwell Esq; attorneys for, and on behalf of, William Davis Esq; --- Plaintiffs. Nian Mullick, --------- Defendant. Et e contra. And between the said John Zephaniah Holwell, as attorney of said William Davis, and the said William Davis in person, -- Appellants. The said Nian Mullick, ------- Respondent. Et e contra. The case of the said William Davis, and of the said John Zephaniah Holwell, as attorney to the said William Davis, the appellant in the original, and respondent in the cross appeal
  by: Davis, William
  Published: (1751)
• An address from John Zephaniah Holwell, Esq. to Luke Scrafton, Esq : in reply to his pamphlet, intitled, Observations on Mr. Vansittart's Narrative
  by: Holwell, John Zephaniah
  Published: (1767)
• Philip Middleton, merchant --- appellant. John Roberts, Esq; Edmund Lock, Henry Nelthorpe ... respondents. And the said John Roberts, ---- appellant. Philip Middleton, and the said other respondents, respondents. The appellant Middleton's case
  by: Middleton, Philip
  Published: (1728)
• An address from John Zephaniah Holwell, Esq; to Luke Scrafton, Esq; in reply to his pamphlet, intitled, observations on Mr. Vansittart's Narrative
  by: Holwell, John Zephaniah
  Published: (1767)
• The Right Hon. John Earl of Selkirk and Ruglen, appellant. The Most Noble James Duke of Hamilton and Brandon, respondent. And the said Duke, - - - - appellant. The said Earl, - - - - respondent. The case of the said Duke, respondent in the original appeal, and appellant in the cross appeal
  by: Hamilton, James Hamilton
  Published: (1740)