Similar Items

• The appellants case : Francis Lord Bishop of Rochester, Dean of the Collegiate Church of St. Peter in Westminster, Michael Evans, Clerk, Lawrence Broderick, Robert Cannon, and Harry Barker, Doctors in Divinity, Prebendaries of the said Collegiate Church Appellants. The Attorney-General, at the Relation of Nicholas Only, Thomas Dent, Thomas Lynford, and Edward Gee, Doctors in Divinity, Samuel Lord Bishop of Carlisle, Five Prebendaries of the Collegiate Church aforesaid, Robert Friend, Doctor in Divinity, Master of Westminster School, and William Farrar, Esq; Respondents
  by: Atterbury, Francis
  Published: (1721)
• Hugh Powell, Esq; plantiff in error, against Our Sovereign Lord the King, defendant. Upon an information in nature of a quo warranto. The case of the defendant in error
  by: Powell, Hugh
  Published: (1729)
• The most noble John, Duke of Marlborough, appellant. Sir Robert Raymond, Kt. Attorney-General, Edward Strong, sen. and Edward Strong, jun. respondents. The case of the respondents, Edward Strong, sen. and jun
  by: Strong, Edward
  Published: (1721)
• The respondent's case : David Powell, an Attorney at Law, and Elizabeth his Wife, Appellts. William Pleydell, Esq; and Robert Colepepyr, Gent. Respondts
  by: Pleydell, William
  Published: (1703)
• The appellant's case : Mr. Attorney-General, appellant. Roger Crofts, Job Allibone, Nevil Ridley, Thomas Ange, Roger Woodcock, Mary Maddison, And others, Respondents
  Published: (1709)