|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02281nmm a2200301 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000391212 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000244265 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
130626 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9783642367908
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Johansson, Per-Olov
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Evaluating Water Projects
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b Cost-Benefit Analysis Versus Win-Win Approach
|c by Per-Olov Johansson, Bengt Kriström
|
| 250 |
|
|
|a 1st ed. 2013
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Berlin, Heidelberg
|b Springer Berlin Heidelberg
|c 2013, 2013
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a VIII, 67 p. 11 illus., 2 illus. in color
|b online resource
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Preface -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Dönje Hydropower Scenario.- 3 The -2,+1 Hydropower Scenario -- 4 A Brief Comparison of the Approaches and an Outlook -- References -- Appendices -- Index
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Environmental Economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Environmental economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Pollution
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Kriström, Bengt
|e [author]
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b Springer
|a Springer eBooks 2005-
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a SpringerBriefs in Economics
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.1007/978-3-642-36790-8
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36790-8?nosfx=y
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 333.7
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Should more water be diverted to or from electricity generation? This timely question is addressed in this short volume. Two different approaches are introduced and compared: The first is a cost-benefit analysis, examining the case of re-regulating a Swedish hydropower plant in which water is diverted from electricity generation to the downstream dryway. The proposed scenario generates environmental and other benefits, but comes at a cost in terms of lost electricity. The second study introduces an approach very different from the one used in conventional cost-benefit analysis, and provides a set of measures designed so that most, if not all, affected parties will be better off. Thus, in contrast to a conventional cost-benefit analysis, which draws on hypothetical compensation measures, the new approach envisages actual compensation. Comparing two different theoretical frameworks on the basis of a real-world case, this study can be seen as a manual that can be used to evaluate reasonably small re-regulation of rivers
|