Australasia and Pacific Ombudsman Institutions Mandates, Competences and Good Practice
Commissioned by the International Ombudsman Institute (IOI), the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights (BIM) in Vienna conducted a comparative analytical study on Ombudsman Institutions in the Australasia and Pacific region between January 2011 and April 2012. In Part 1, this book provides an a...
| Corporate Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Berlin, Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2013, 2013
|
| Edition: | 1st ed. 2013 |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Collection: | Springer eBooks 2005- - Collection details see MPG.ReNa |
Table of Contents:
- Part 1 Comparative Analysis of the Ombudsman Institutions: Introduction
- Legal Framework
- Mandate
- Powers
- Awareness and Outreach
- Good Practice Examples
- Part 2: Reports on Different Jurisdictions: Australia Commonwealth Ombudsman
- Australia Ombudsman New South Wales
- Australia Northern Territory Ombudsman
- Australia Queensland Ombudsman
- Australia South Australian Ombudsman
- Australia Tasmanian Ombudsman
- Australia Victorian Ombudsman
- Australia Western Australian Ombudsman
- Hong Kong (Special Administrative Region of China) Ombudsman
- Cook Islands Ombudsman
- New Zealand Ombudsmen
- Papua New Guinea Ombudsman Commission
- Samoa Ombudsman
- Taiwan – Control Yuan
- Tonga Commissioner for Public Relations
- Vanuatu Ombudsman
- Annex