|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02798nmm a2200385 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000360259 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000213311 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
130626 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781402099601
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Charbit, Yves
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Economic, Social and Demographic Thought in the XIXth Century
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b The Population Debate from Malthus to Marx
|c by Yves Charbit
|
| 250 |
|
|
|a 1st ed. 2009
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Dordrecht
|b Springer Netherlands
|c 2009, 2009
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a X, 190 p
|b online resource
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a The Population Controversy and Beyond -- Population, Economic Growth and Religion: Malthus as a Populationist -- From Malthusianism to Populationism: The French Liberal Economists (1840–1870) -- The Malthusian Trap: The Failure of Proudhon -- Capitalism and Population: Marx and Engels Against Malthus -- Beneath Demographic Issues
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Business
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Economics / History
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Population Economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Management science
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Population and Demography
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Sociology / Methodology
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Business and Management
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a History of Economic Thought and Methodology
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Demography
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Population
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Population / Economic aspects
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Sociological Methods
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b Springer
|a Springer eBooks 2005-
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.1007/978-1-4020-9960-1
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9960-1?nosfx=y
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 304.6
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a According to current understanding, Malthus was hostile to an excess of population because it caused social sufferings, while Marx was favourable to demographic growth in so far as a large proletariat was a factor aggravating the contradictions of capitalism. This is unfortunately an oversimplification. Both raised the same crucial question: when considered as an economic variable, how does population fit into the analysis of economic growth? Even though they started from the same analytical standpoint, Marx established a very different diagnosis from that of Malthus and built a social doctrine no less divergent. The book also discusses the theoretical and doctrinal contribution of the liberal economists, writing at the onset of the industrial revolution in France (1840-1870), and those of their contemporary, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, who shared with Marx the denunciation of the capitalist system. By paying careful attention to the social, economic, and political context, this book goes beyond the shortcomings of the classification between pro- and anti-populationism. It sheds new light over nineteenth century controversies over population in France, a case study for Europe
|