Differential Subject Marking

Although (almost) all sentences have subjects, not all sentences encode their subjects in the same way. Some languages overtly mark some subjects, but not others, depending on certain features of the subject argument or the sentence in which the subject figures. This phenomenon is known as Different...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: de Hoop, Helen (Editor), de Swart, Peter (Editor)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 2009, 2009
Edition:1st ed. 2009
Series:Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Springer eBooks 2005- - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 03037nmm a2200349 u 4500
001 EB000359376
003 EBX01000000000000000212428
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 130626 ||| eng
020 |a 9781402064975 
100 1 |a de Hoop, Helen  |e [editor] 
245 0 0 |a Differential Subject Marking  |h Elektronische Ressource  |c edited by Helen de Hoop, Peter de Swart 
250 |a 1st ed. 2009 
260 |a Dordrecht  |b Springer Netherlands  |c 2009, 2009 
300 |a XII, 312 p  |b online resource 
505 0 |a Cross-linguistic Variation in Differential Subject Marking -- Differential Subject Marking at Argument Structure, Syntax, and PF -- Quantitative Variation in Korean Case Ellipsis: Implications for Case Theory -- Ergative Case-marking in Hindi -- DOM and Two Types of DSM in Turkish -- Differential Subject Marking in Polish: The Case of Genitive vs. Nominative Subjects in “X was not at Y”-constructions -- Differential Argument Marking in Two-term Case Systems and its Implications for the General Theory of Case Marking -- Non-canonical Agent Marking in Agul -- From Topic to Subject Marking: Implications for a Typology of Subject Marking -- Grammaticalization and Strategies in Resolving Subject Marking Paradoxes: The Case of Tsimshianic -- Different Subjects, Different Marking -- Differential Marking of Intransitive Subjects in Kambera (Austronesian) 
653 |a Syntax 
653 |a Theoretical Linguistics / Grammar 
653 |a Linguistics 
653 |a Comparative linguistics 
653 |a Comparative Linguistics 
653 |a Semiotics 
653 |a Grammar, Comparative and general / Syntax 
700 1 |a de Swart, Peter  |e [editor] 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b Springer  |a Springer eBooks 2005- 
490 0 |a Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 
028 5 0 |a 10.1007/978-1-4020-6497-5 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6497-5?nosfx=y  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 410.1 
520 |a Although (almost) all sentences have subjects, not all sentences encode their subjects in the same way. Some languages overtly mark some subjects, but not others, depending on certain features of the subject argument or the sentence in which the subject figures. This phenomenon is known as Differential Subject Marking (DSM). Languages differ in which conditions govern DSM. Some languages differentiate their subjects on the basis of semantic features of the argument such as thematic role, volitionality, animacy, whereas others differentiate on the basis of clausal features such as tense/aspect and the main/dependent clause distinction. DSM comes in different formal guises: case marking, agreement, inverse systems, and voice alternations. Relatively much is known about cross-linguistic variation in the marking of subjects, yet little attempt has been made to formalize the facts. This volume aims to unify formal approaches to language and presents both specific case studies of DSM and theoretical approaches