|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
04158nmm a2200361 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000358418 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000211470 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
130626 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781402042515
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Schickore, Jutta
|e [editor]
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Revisiting Discovery and Justification
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b Historical and philosophical perspectives on the context distinction
|c edited by Jutta Schickore, Friedrich Steinle
|
| 250 |
|
|
|a 1st ed. 2006
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Dordrecht
|b Springer Netherlands
|c 2006, 2006
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a XIX, 229 p
|b online resource
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a INTRODUCTION: REVISITING THE CONTEXT DISTINCTION -- The contexts of the Distinction -- LOST WANDERERS IN THE FOREST OF KNOWLEDGE: SOME THOUGHTS ON THE DISCOVERY-JUSTIFICATION DISTINCTION -- INDUCTIVE JUSTIFICATION AND DISCOVERY. ON HANS REICHENBACH’S FOUNDATION OF THE AUTONOMY OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE -- FREEDOM IN A SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY: READING THE CONTEXT OF REICHENBACH’S CONTEXTS -- Forerunners? -- A FORERUNNER?—PERHAPS, BUT NOT TO THE CONTEXT DISTINCTION. WILLIAM WHEWELL’S GERMANO-CANTABRIGIAN HISTORY OF THE FUNDAMENTAL IDEAS -- AUTONOMY VERSUS DEVELOPMENT: DUHEM ON PROGRESS IN SCIENCE -- PSYCHOLOGISM AND THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN DISCOVERY AND JUSTIFICATION -- Revisions and Applications -- HEURISTIC APPRAISAL: CONTEXT OF DISCOVERY OR JUSTIFICATION? -- CONCEPT FORMATION AND THE LIMITS OF JUSTIFICATION: “DISCOVERING” THE TWO ELECTRICITIES -- CONTEXTS OF JUSTIFYING AND DISCOVERING THE NATURE OF ECOSYSTEMS: FROM CONCEPTS TO OBJECTS AND VICE VERSA -- ON THE INEXTRICABILITY OF THE CONTEXT OF DISCOVERY AND THE CONTEXT OF JUSTIFICATION -- CONTEXT OF DISCOVERY VERSUS CONTEXT OF JUSTIFICATION AND THOMAS KUHN -- HOW CAN WE USE THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN DISCOVERY AND JUSTIFICATION? ON THE WEAKNESSES OF THE STRONG PROGRAMME IN THE SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENCE.
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Philosophy / History
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a History of Philosophy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Knowledge, Theory of
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Science / Philosophy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Epistemology
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a History of Science
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Science / History
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Philosophy of Science
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Steinle, Friedrich
|e [editor]
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b Springer
|a Springer eBooks 2005-
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a Archimedes, New Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.1007/1-4020-4251-5
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4251-5?nosfx=y
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 501
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a The distinction between the contexts of discovery and justification has had a turbulent career in philosophy of science. At times celebrated as the hallmark of philosophical approaches to science, at times condemned as ambiguous, distorting, and misleading, the distinction dominated philosophical debates from the early decades of the twentieth century to the 1980s. Until today, it informs our conception of the content, domain, and goals of philosophy of science. It is due to this fact that new trends in philosophy of experimentation and history and sociology of science have been marginalized by traditional scholarship in philosophy. To acknowledge properly this important recent work we need to re-open the debate about the nature, development, and significance of the context distinction, about its merits and flaws. The contributions to this volume provide close readings and detailed analyses of the original textual sources for the context distinction. They revise those accounts of ‘forerunners’ of the distinction that have been written through the lens of Logical Empiricism. They map, clarify, and analyse the derivations and mutations of the context distinctions as we encounter them in current history and philosophy of science. The re-evaluation of the distinction helps us deal with the philosophical challenges that the New Experimentalism and historically, socio-politically and economically oriented science studies have placed before us. This volume thus clears the ground for the productive and fruitful integration of these new developments into philosophy of science
|