Chronic urinary retention comparative effectiveness and harms of treatments
We extracted data, assessed risk of bias on individual studies, and evaluated strength of evidence for each comparison and outcome. RESULTS: We identified 11 publications reporting original research and 2 relevant systematic reviews that met eligibility criteria. Results are analyzed by etiology: ob...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Corporate Authors: | , , |
| Format: | eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Rockville, MD
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
September 2014, 2014
|
| Series: | Comparative effectiveness review
|
| Online Access: | |
| Collection: | National Center for Biotechnology Information - Collection details see MPG.ReNa |
Table of Contents:
- Includes bibliographical references