|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02183nam a2200289 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB002159476 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000001297591 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
tu||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
230515 r ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|z 9781760465414
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781760465414
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a JF1525.P6
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Gerblinger, Christiane
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a How government experts self-sabotage
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b the language of the rebuffed
|c Christiane Gerblinger
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Canberra ACT, Australia
|b Australian National University, ANU Press
|c 2022, [2022]
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a 1. Introduction -- 2. Strategies of Impersonality: Constructing a Framework for the Rebuffed -- 3. Knowing What not to Know: Advice on South Australia's Blackout and the Role of Renewable Energy -- 4. Excess of Objectivity: Australian Intelligence Assessments of Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction -- 5. The Language of the Unrebuffed -- 6. Conclusion
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Includes bibliographical references and index
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Political planning
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b ZDB-39-JOA
|a JSTOR Open Access Books
|
| 776 |
|
|
|z 1760465429
|
| 776 |
|
|
|z 9781760465421
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jj.399494
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 230.6
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a After official policy advice to governments is publicly released, governments are often accused of ignoring or rejecting their experts. Commonly represented as politicisation, this depiction is superficial. Digging deeper, is there something about the official advice itself that makes it easy to ignore? Instead of lamenting a demise of expertise, Christiane Gerblinger asks: does the expert advice of policy officials feature characteristics that invite its government audience to overlook or misread it? To answer this question, Gerblinger critically examines official policy advice and finds the language of the rebuffed: government experts reluctant to disclose what they know so as to accommodate political circumstances. She argues that this language evades stable meaning and diminishes the democratic right of citizens to scrutinise the work of government
|