China in Global Governance of Intellectual Property Implications for Global Distributive Justice

This book analyses how China has engaged in global IP governance and the implications of its engagement for global distributive justice. It investigates five cases on China’s IP engagement in geographical indications, the disclosure obligation, IP and standardisation, and its bilateral and multilate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cheng, Wenting
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Cham Palgrave Macmillan 2023, 2023
Edition:1st ed. 2023
Series:Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Springer eBooks 2005- - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 03970nmm a2200409 u 4500
001 EB002150353
003 EBX01000000000000001288479
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 230301 ||| eng
020 |a 9783031243707 
100 1 |a Cheng, Wenting 
245 0 0 |a China in Global Governance of Intellectual Property  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b Implications for Global Distributive Justice  |c by Wenting Cheng 
250 |a 1st ed. 2023 
260 |a Cham  |b Palgrave Macmillan  |c 2023, 2023 
300 |a XXVII, 290 p. 14 illus., 12 illus. in color  |b online resource 
505 0 |a Part I: Introduction to IP -- Chapter 1: Introduction -- Part II: Case Studies -- Chapter 2: China Enga/ges in International Regulation of Geographical Indications -- Chapter 3: China Engages in International Regulation of Disclosure Obligation -- Chapter 4: China Emerges in International Standardisation -- Chapter 5: China’s Bilateral IP Engagement: A Look into the Chinese FTAs -- Chapter 6: China and Multilateral IP Governance -- Part III: Discussion -- Chapter 7: Who Governs? Actors in China’s International IP Engagement -- Chapter 8: Principles for China’s International IP Engagement -- Chapter 9: China’s Strategies to Engage in Global IP Governance -- Chapter 10: Conclusion 
653 |a Public International Law 
653 |a International law 
653 |a Socio-Legal Studies 
653 |a IT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property 
653 |a International Relations 
653 |a Governance and Government 
653 |a Crime and Society 
653 |a Law and the social sciences 
653 |a Information technology / Law and legislation 
653 |a Mass media / Law and legislation 
653 |a Political science 
653 |a Crime / Sociological aspects 
653 |a International relations 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b Springer  |a Springer eBooks 2005- 
490 0 |a Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies 
028 5 0 |a 10.1007/978-3-031-24370-7 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24370-7?nosfx=y  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 340.115 
520 |a This book analyses how China has engaged in global IP governance and the implications of its engagement for global distributive justice. It investigates five cases on China’s IP engagement in geographical indications, the disclosure obligation, IP and standardisation, and its bilateral and multilateral IP engagement. It takes a regulation-oriented approach to examine substate and non-state actors involved in China’s global IP engagement, identifies principles that have guided or constrained its engagement, and discusses strategies actors have used in managing the principles. Its focus on engagement directs attention to processes instead of outcomes, which enables a more nuanced understanding of the role that China plays in global IP governance than the dichotomic categorisation of China either as a global IP rule-taker or rule-maker. This book identifies two groups of strategies that China has used in its global IP engagement: forum and agenda-related strategies and principle-related strategies. The first group concerns questions of where and how China has advanced its IP agenda, including multi-forum engagement, dissembling, and more cohesive responsive engagement. The second group consists of strategies to achieve a certain principle or manage contesting principles, including modelling and balancing. It shows that China’s deployment of engagement strategies makes its IP system similar to those of the EU and the US. Its balancing strategy has led to constructed inconsistency of its IP positions across forums. This book argues that China still has some way to go to influence global IP agenda-setting in a way matching its status as the second largest economy. Wenting Cheng is Grand Challenge Research Fellow at the College of Law, the Australian National University (ANU), Canberra, Australia