Types and amounts of complementary foods and beverages and bone health a systematic review

This systematic review was conducted by a team of staff from NESR in collaboration with a Technical Expert Collaborative.2. A literature search was conducted using 4 databases (CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed) to identify articles published from January 1980 to July 2016 that examined the the t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Obbagy, Julie E.
Corporate Author: Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion (U.S.) Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Alexandria, VA U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review April 2019, 2019
Online Access:
Collection: National Center for Biotechnology Information - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 04523nam a2200265 u 4500
001 EB002136260
003 EBX01000000000000001274387
005 00000000000000.0
007 tu|||||||||||||||||||||
008 221206 r ||| eng
100 1 |a Obbagy, Julie E. 
245 0 0 |a Types and amounts of complementary foods and beverages and bone health  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b a systematic review  |c Julie E. Obbagy, Laural K. English, Tricia L. Psota, Perrine Nadaud, Kirsten Johns, Yat Ping Wong, Nancy Terry, Nancy F. Butte, Kathryn G. Dewey, David M. Fleischer, Mary Kay Fox, Frank R. Greer, Nancy F. Krebs, Kelley S. Scanlon, Kellie O. Casavale, Joanne M. Spahn, Eve Stoody 
260 |a Alexandria, VA  |b U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review  |c April 2019, 2019 
300 |a 1 PDF file (70 pages)  |b illustrations 
505 0 |a Includes bibliographical references 
710 2 |a Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion (U.S.)  |b Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b NCBI  |a National Center for Biotechnology Information 
500 |a "This systematic review has also been published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2019;109(7):872S-878S"--PDF title page verso 
856 4 0 |u https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK581994  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 610 
520 |a This systematic review was conducted by a team of staff from NESR in collaboration with a Technical Expert Collaborative.2. A literature search was conducted using 4 databases (CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed) to identify articles published from January 1980 to July 2016 that examined the the types and amounts of complementary foods and beverages (CFB) consumed and bone health. CFB were defined as foods and beverages other than human milk or infant formula provided to an infant or young child. Bone health outcomes included bone, biomarkers of bone metabolism, and incidence and prevalence of osteoporosis, osteopenia, rickets, and fracture. A manual search was done to identify articles that may not have been included in the electronic databases searched. Articles were screened in a dual manner, independently by 2 NESR analysts, to determine which articles met predetermined criteria for inclusion.3. Data from each included article were extracted, risk of bias was assessed.  
520 |a BACKGROUND: 1. Complementary feeding is the process that starts when human milk or infant formula is complemented by other foods and beverages, beginning during infancy and typically continuing to 24 months of age.2. This systematic review was conducted by the Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review (NESR) team as part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Department of Health and Human Services Pregnancy and Birth to 24 Months Project.3. The goal of this systematic review was to answer the following research question: What is the relationship between types and/or amounts of complementary foods and beverages and bone health? CONCLUSION STATEMENT AND GRADES: 1. Insufficient evidence is available to draw conclusions about the relationship between the types and/or amounts of complementary foods and beverages consumed and bone health. Grade: [Grade Not Assignable] METHODS: 1.  
520 |a Although both cohort studies included in this review assessed dietary patterns at 12-13 months, in relationship to a single assessment of bone mineral content at 4 or 6 years of age, it is not possible to draw conclusions for types and/or amounts of CFB and bone health given the non-specific nature of the dietary patterns, as well as the long interval between the assessment of dietary pattern and radiological measurement of bone health 
520 |a The body of evidence was qualitatively synthesized, a conclusion statement was developed and the strength of the evidence (grade) was assessed using pre-established criteria including evaluation of the internal validity/risk of bias, adequacy, consistency, impact, and generalizability of available evidence. Research recommendations were identified. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE: 1. Two prospective cohort studies published since 1980 met the inclusion criteria for this review, both of which examined the relationship between infants' and toddlers' dietary patterns and bone health.2. The ability to draw conclusions about the relationship between the types and/or amounts of CFB consumed and bone health is limited by an overall lack of research.3.