Morals not knowledge recasting the contemporary U.S. conflict between religion and science

"Academics have long claimed that the relationship between religion and science concerns knowledge of the physical world, and that conflict ensues because religion has one way of knowing and science another. For example, it is claimed that to find the age of the Earth religious people look to h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Evans, John Hyde
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Oakland, California University of California Press 2018, [2018]©2018
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: JSTOR Open Access Books - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02728nam a2200301 u 4500
001 EB002133256
003 EBX01000000000000001271313
005 00000000000000.0
007 tu|||||||||||||||||||||
008 221110 r ||| eng
020 |z 9780520297432 (pbk. : alk. paper 
020 |a 9780520297432  |c (pbk. : alk. paper 
020 |a 0520969782 
050 4 |a BL240.3 
100 1 |a Evans, John Hyde 
245 0 0 |a Morals not knowledge  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b recasting the contemporary U.S. conflict between religion and science  |c John H. Evans 
260 |a Oakland, California  |b University of California Press  |c 2018, [2018]©2018 
300 |a 1 online resource 
505 0 |a Includes bibliographical references and index 
505 0 |a Introduction -- The religion and science advocates in the academic debate -- The academic analysts of the relationship between religion and science -- Recent transformation of elite academic and public debates -- Existing research on the public -- Empirical tests of knowledge and belief conflict for the religious public -- Empirical tests of moral conflict for the religious public -- Conclusion 
653 |a RELIGION / Religion & Science 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b ZDB-39-JOA  |a JSTOR Open Access Books 
024 8 |a 10.1525/9780520969780 
776 |z 9780520969780 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt2204r5c  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 201/.650973 
520 |a "Academics have long claimed that the relationship between religion and science concerns knowledge of the physical world, and that conflict ensues because religion has one way of knowing and science another. For example, it is claimed that to find the age of the Earth religious people look to holy scripture and scientists look at the age of rocks. This book shows that this is indeed true among the elites who focus on this debate. However, contrary to the assumptions of elites and public discourse in general, that same relationship and conflict does not exist between religious citizens and science. This book shows that regular religious people in the U.S. are at most in conflict over a few fact claims with science, and that this limited conflict does not lead to conflict with scientific claims writ large. More importantly, American religion has changed since the 1960s, de-emphasizing knowledge claims about the physical world, and becoming more focused on social relationships and thus morality. This book shows that any religion and science debate in the public is not about scientific claims about nature, such as the age of the Earth, but rather about morality - and opposition to the morality implicitly promoted by scientists"--Provided by publisher