Can Conditional Cash Transfers Compensate for a Father's Absence?

This paper investigates how the permanent departure of the father from a household affects children's school enrollment and work participation in rural Colombia. The results indicate that the permanent departure of the father decreases children's school enrollment by approximately 5 percen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fitzsimons, Emla
Other Authors: Mesnard, Alice
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Washington, D.C The World Bank 2013
Online Access:
Collection: World Bank E-Library Archive - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 01776nmm a2200229 u 4500
001 EB002100883
003 EBX01000000000000001240973
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 221013 ||| eng
100 1 |a Fitzsimons, Emla 
245 0 0 |a Can Conditional Cash Transfers Compensate for a Father's Absence?  |h Elektronische Ressource  |c Emla Fitzsimons 
260 |a Washington, D.C  |b The World Bank  |c 2013 
300 |a 52 p 
700 1 |a Mesnard, Alice 
700 1 |a Fitzsimons, Emla 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b WOBA  |a World Bank E-Library Archive 
028 5 0 |a 10.1596/1813-9450-6476 
856 4 0 |u http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/1813-9450-6476  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 330 
520 |a This paper investigates how the permanent departure of the father from a household affects children's school enrollment and work participation in rural Colombia. The results indicate that the permanent departure of the father decreases children's school enrollment by approximately 5 percentage points and increases child labor by 3 percentage points. This paper explores the rollout of a conditional-cash-transfer program during the period of study and shows that this program counteracts these adverse effects. When coupled with other evidence, this finding strongly suggests that the channel through which the father's departure most affects children is by reducing the income of very poor households, which tightens their liquidity constraints. This finding also highlights the important safety-net role played by welfare programs with respect to disadvantaged households, particularly because these households are unlikely to have formal or informal mechanisms with which to insure themselves against such vagaries