Why is Voluntary Financial Education so Unpopular? Experimental Evidence from Mexico

Take-up of voluntary financial education programs is typically extremely low. This paper reports on randomized experiments around a large financial literacy course offered in Mexico City to understand the reasons for low take-up, and to measure the impact of financial education. It documents that th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bruhn, Miriam
Other Authors: McKenzie, David, Ibarra, Gabriel Lara
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Washington, D.C The World Bank 2013
Online Access:
Collection: World Bank E-Library Archive - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02187nmm a2200241 u 4500
001 EB002100847
003 EBX01000000000000001240937
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 221013 ||| eng
100 1 |a Bruhn, Miriam 
245 0 0 |a Why is Voluntary Financial Education so Unpopular?  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b Experimental Evidence from Mexico  |c Miriam Bruhn 
260 |a Washington, D.C  |b The World Bank  |c 2013 
300 |a 46 p 
700 1 |a McKenzie, David 
700 1 |a Ibarra, Gabriel Lara 
700 1 |a Bruhn, Miriam 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b WOBA  |a World Bank E-Library Archive 
028 5 0 |a 10.1596/1813-9450-6439 
856 4 0 |u http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/1813-9450-6439  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 330 
520 |a Take-up of voluntary financial education programs is typically extremely low. This paper reports on randomized experiments around a large financial literacy course offered in Mexico City to understand the reasons for low take-up, and to measure the impact of financial education. It documents that the general public displays little interest in such courses and that participation is low even among individuals who express interest in financial education. The paper experimentally investigates barriers to take-up, and finds no impact of relaxing reputational or logistical constraints and no evidence that time inconsistency is the reason for limited participation. Even relatively sizeable monetary incentives get less than 40 percent of interested individuals invited to training to attend. Using a randomized encouragement design, the authors measure the impact of the course on financial knowledge and behavior. Attending training results in a 9 percentage point increase in financial knowledge and a 9 percentage point increase in saving outcomes, but no impact on borrowing behavior. Administrative data indicate that the savings impact is relatively short-lived. The results suggest people are making optimal choices not to attend financial education courses, and point to the limits of using general purpose courses to improve financial behavior for the general population