Local inequality and project choice theory and evidence from Ecuador

"This paper provides evidence consistent with elite capture of Social Fund investment projects in Ecuador. Exploiting a unique combination of data-sets on village-level income distributions, Social Fund project administration, and province level electoral results, the authors test a simple mode...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Araujo, M. Caridad
Corporate Author: World Bank
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: [Washington, D.C] World Bank 2006
Series:Policy research working paper
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: World Bank E-Library Archive - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 01886nmm a2200265 u 4500
001 EB002097599
003 EBX01000000000000001237689
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 221013 ||| eng
100 1 |a Araujo, M. Caridad 
245 0 0 |a Local inequality and project choice  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b theory and evidence from Ecuador  |c M. Caridad Araujo ...[et al.] 
260 |a [Washington, D.C]  |b World Bank  |c 2006 
653 |a Infrastructure (Economics) / Ecuador 
653 |a Public investments / Ecuador 
653 |a Income distribution / Ecuador 
700 1 |a Araujo, M. Caridad 
710 2 |a World Bank 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b WOBA  |a World Bank E-Library Archive 
490 0 |a Policy research working paper 
500 |a Includes bibliographical references. - Title from PDF file as viewed on 9/6/2006 
856 4 0 |u http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-3997  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 330 
520 |a "This paper provides evidence consistent with elite capture of Social Fund investment projects in Ecuador. Exploiting a unique combination of data-sets on village-level income distributions, Social Fund project administration, and province level electoral results, the authors test a simple model of project choice when local political power is unequally distributed. In accordance with the predictions of the model, poorer villages are more likely to receive projects that provide excludable (private) goods to the poor, such as latrines. Controlling for poverty, more unequal communities are less likely to receive such projects. Consistent with the hypothesis of elite capture, these results are sensitive to the specific measure of inequality used in the empirical analysis, and are strongest for expenditure shares at the top of the distribution. "--World Bank web site