Disciplining agricultural support through decoupling

"Agricultural protection, particularly in high income countries, have induced overproduction, thereby depressing world commodity prices and reducing export shares of countries which do not support agriculture. One-and perhaps the only-effective way to bring a socially acceptable and politically...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Baffes, John
Corporate Author: World Bank
Other Authors: De Gorter, Harry
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: [Washington, D.C] World Bank 2005
Series:Policy research working paper
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: World Bank E-Library Archive - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02647nmm a2200265 u 4500
001 EB002097135
003 EBX01000000000000001237225
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 221013 ||| eng
100 1 |a Baffes, John 
245 0 0 |a Disciplining agricultural support through decoupling  |h Elektronische Ressource  |c John Baffes, Harry De Gorter 
260 |a [Washington, D.C]  |b World Bank  |c 2005 
653 |a Overproduction 
653 |a Agriculture and state 
653 |a Agricultural subsidies 
700 1 |a De Gorter, Harry 
710 2 |a World Bank 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b WOBA  |a World Bank E-Library Archive 
490 0 |a Policy research working paper 
500 |a Includes bibliographical references. - Title from PDF file as viewed on 4/6/2005 
856 4 0 |u http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-3533  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 330 
520 |a "Agricultural protection, particularly in high income countries, have induced overproduction, thereby depressing world commodity prices and reducing export shares of countries which do not support agriculture. One-and perhaps the only-effective way to bring a socially acceptable and politically feasible reform is to replace payments linked to current production levels, input use, and prices by payments which are decoupled from these measures. Overall, the experience with decoupling agricultural support has been mixed while the switch to less distortive support has been uneven across commodities and countries. Rules have changed with new decoupling programs added so expectations about future policies affect current production decisions. Time limits were not implemented and if so, were overruled. Ideally, compensation programs would be universal (open to all sectors in the economy, not just agriculture) or at least non-sector-specific within agriculture. A simple and minimally distorting scheme would be a one-time unconditional payment to everyone engaged in farming or deemed in need of compensation that is nontransferable, along the lines of one-time buyouts without remaining subsidies. To maintain government credibility and reduce uncertainty, eligibility rules need to be clearly defined and not allowed to change. The time period on which payments are based, the level of payments, and the sectors covered should all remain fixed. Support to specific sectors within agriculture should be in the form of taxpayer-funded payments. There should be no requirement of production. Land, labor, and any other input should not have to be in "agricultural use." "--World Bank web site