Trade reform and household welfare the case of Mexico

Results from a two-step simulation that uses a computable general equilibrium model and detailed consumption and income household data suggests that trade liberalization benefits people in the poorest deciles more than those in the richer ones

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ianchovichina, Elena
Corporate Author: World Bank Development Research Group
Other Authors: Nicita, Alessandro, Soloaga, Isidro
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Washington, D.C World Bank, Development Research Group, Trade 2001
Series:Policy research working paper
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: World Bank E-Library Archive - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 01580nmm a2200301 u 4500
001 EB002096301
003 EBX01000000000000001236391
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 221013 ||| eng
100 1 |a Ianchovichina, Elena 
245 0 0 |a Trade reform and household welfare  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b the case of Mexico  |c Elena Ianchovichina, Alessandro Nicita and Isidro Soloaga 
260 |a Washington, D.C  |b World Bank, Development Research Group, Trade  |c 2001 
651 4 |a Mexico / Commercial policy / Economic aspects / Econometric models 
653 |a Income / Mexico / Econometric models 
653 |a Free trade / Economic aspects / Mexico / Econometric models 
653 |a Consumption (Economics) / Mexico / Econometric models 
653 |a Household surveys / Mexico 
700 1 |a Nicita, Alessandro 
700 1 |a Soloaga, Isidro 
710 2 |a World Bank  |b Development Research Group 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b WOBA  |a World Bank E-Library Archive 
490 0 |a Policy research working paper 
500 |a "August 2001. - Includes bibliographical references (p. 21-23). - Title from title screen as viewed on Aug. 30, 2002 
856 4 0 |u http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-2667  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 330 
520 |a Results from a two-step simulation that uses a computable general equilibrium model and detailed consumption and income household data suggests that trade liberalization benefits people in the poorest deciles more than those in the richer ones