U.S. overseas military presence what are the strategic choices?

"Since World War II, the United States has relied on a global network of military bases and forces to protect its interests and those of its allies. But the international environment has changed greatly over the decades, and economic concerns have risen, leading some to debate just what America...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Davis, Lynn E.
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Santa Monica, CA RAND 2013, ©2013
Series:Rand Corporation monograph series
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: JSTOR Open Access Books - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 04629nam a2200469 u 4500
001 EB002053489
003 EBX01000000000000001197155
005 00000000000000.0
007 tu|||||||||||||||||||||
008 220823 r ||| eng
020 |z 9780833073402 
020 |a 9780833073402 
020 |z 0833073400 
020 |a 0833073400 
020 |z 0833073834 
020 |a 0833073834 
020 |z 9780833073839 
020 |a 9780833073839 
050 4 |a UA26.A2 
100 1 |a Davis, Lynn E. 
245 0 0 |a U.S. overseas military presence  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b what are the strategic choices?  |c Lynn E. Davis [and others] 
260 |a Santa Monica, CA  |b RAND  |c 2013, ©2013 
300 |a xvii, 50 pages  |b maps 
505 0 |a Introduction -- Study objectives and scope -- Analysis framework -- Organization of this monograph -- Path to defining future global U.S. postures -- Global U.S. security interests -- Perspectives on global presence needed to achieve U.S. security interests in East Asia, Europe, and the Middle East -- Perspectives lead to global postures -- Comparison of global postures -- Operational performance -- Global postures support other U.S. security interests -- Characteristics of global postures -- Strategic choices: Overseas U.S. military presence -- Appendix A. Protecting the global commons: confusing means with ends -- Appendix B. Design of database of current U.S. bases overseas -- Appendix C. Comparison of global postures. Tables -- Table 2.1. Global U.S. security interests -- Table 2.2. Global U.S. security interests and regional threats -- Table 2.3. Perspectives on achieving U.S. security interests in East Asia -- Table 2.4 Perspectives on achieving U.S. security interests in countries across Europe and the Middle East -- Table 3.1. Characteristics of global postures -- Table B.1. Air fields presently used by USAF common to all global postures -- Table B.2. Air fields presently used by USAF in some global postures 
505 0 |a Introduction -- Path to defining future global U.S. postures -- Comparison of global postures -- Strategic choices: overseas U.S. military presence -- Appendix A. Protecting the global commons: confusing means with ends -- Appendix B. Design of database of current U.S. bases overseas -- Appendix C. Comparison of global postures 
505 0 |a Includes bibliographical references 
651 4 |a United States / Armed Forces / Foreign countries 
651 4 |a United States / fast 
653 |a TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Military Science 
653 |a HISTORY / Military / Other 
653 |a Strategy 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b ZDB-39-JOA  |a JSTOR Open Access Books 
490 0 |a Rand Corporation monograph series 
024 8 |a RAND/MG-1211-AF 
776 |z 9780833073846 
776 |z 0833073842 
776 |z 0833073826 
776 |z 9780833073822 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg1211af  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 355/.033573 
520 |a "Since World War II, the United States has relied on a global network of military bases and forces to protect its interests and those of its allies. But the international environment has changed greatly over the decades, and economic concerns have risen, leading some to debate just what America's role should now be in the world. This monograph addresses one aspect of this debate by introducing a new analytical approach to defining future U.S. military presence overseas. It does so by first considering U.S. global security interests, then focusing on specific threats to them in East Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. With that, the researchers designed a menu of global postures based on different strategic perspectives. They evaluated the global postures in terms of their operational performance and then compared them in terms of their associated U.S. Air Force bases, combat forces, active-duty personnel, and base operating costs. These analyses offer insights on the critical strategic choices that policymakers need to address and that the public needs to debate as they consider future overseas U.S. military presence. Among these choices are for the United States to depend more on its allies, rely more on U.S. based military forces, focus its presence more on East Asia or on the Middle East, or retain its current overseas presence in the face of expanding threats. Those involved in debates on the future global U.S. posture will need to make explicit their implicit underlying perspectives on what role overseas military presence can play in achieving U.S. global security interests."--Publisher's description