|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01594nam a2200253 u 4500 |
001 |
EB002010671 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000001173570 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
tu||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
220201 r ||| eng |
100 |
1 |
|
|a Li, Ke Xin
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Walkers with wheels versus walkers without wheels for fall prevention in older adults
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b a review of the comparative clinical effectiveness
|c Ke Xin Li, Kelly Farrah
|
250 |
|
|
|a Version: 1.0
|
260 |
|
|
|a Ottawa (ON)
|b Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
|c 2019, July 22, 2019
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 PDF file (13 pages)
|b illustration
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Includes bibliographical references
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Farrah, Kelly
|e [author]
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
|b Rapid Response Service
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b NCBI
|a National Center for Biotechnology Information
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a CADTH rapid response report: summary with critical appraisal
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546714
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 610
|
520 |
|
|
|a One systematic review was identified regarding the comparative effectiveness of walkers with wheels versus walkers without wheels for fall prevention in older adults. Evidence of limited quality from the systematic review suggested that older patients walking with a nonwheeled frame would cover shorter distances and use more energy than those walking with wheeled frames. The evidence presented in this report should be interpreted with caution based on the limitations and paucity of comparative data
|