Overview of systematic methodology reviews of the design and conduct of randomized trials and systematic reviews of healthcare interventions

As a consequence, many decisions about the design and reporting of randomized trials and systematic reviews must be based on logical arguments, often with uncertainty about what empirical evidence is available, due to the lack of a systematic methodology review, or uncertainty about the impact of al...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Corporate Author: Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter for helsetjenesten
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Oslo Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter for helsetjenesten 2006, 2006
Series:Rapport fra Kunnskapssenteret
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: National Center for Biotechnology Information - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 03248nam a2200301 u 4500
001 EB001874897
003 EBX01000000000000001038264
005 00000000000000.0
007 tu|||||||||||||||||||||
008 191026 r ||| eng
020 |a 9788281211117 
020 |a 8281211113 
245 0 0 |a Overview of systematic methodology reviews of the design and conduct of randomized trials and systematic reviews of healthcare interventions  |h Elektronische Ressource  |c Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter for helsetjenesten 
260 |a Oslo  |b Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter for helsetjenesten  |c 2006, 2006 
300 |a 1 PDF file (55 pages) 
505 0 |a Includes bibliographical references 
653 |a Systematic Reviews as Topic 
653 |a Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic 
653 |a Research Design 
710 2 |a Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter for helsetjenesten 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b NCBI  |a National Center for Biotechnology Information 
490 0 |a Rapport fra Kunnskapssenteret 
856 4 0 |u https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK464858  |3 Volltext  |n NLM Bookshelf Books  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 610 
520 |a As a consequence, many decisions about the design and reporting of randomized trials and systematic reviews must be based on logical arguments, often with uncertainty about what empirical evidence is available, due to the lack of a systematic methodology review, or uncertainty about the impact of alternative decisions, due to the lack of empirical evidence. This uncertainty not only impacts on the use of resources for research, but it has important consequences for the availability of reliable evidence to inform decisions about health care 
520 |a Background Decisions about the design and reporting of randomized trials and systematic reviews should be informed by the best available methodological research. Ideally this evidence should be summarised in systematic reviews. This overview includes systematic methodology reviews relevant to conducting and reporting pragmatic randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews of RCTs. It was undertaken as part of Practihc (Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trials in HealthCare) and in collaboration with ESCORT. This overview of reviews aims to support Practihc guidance for designing pragmatic randomised trials:1. to inform future revisions of the CONSORT guidelines for reporting randomised trials2. to inform guidelines for conducting and reporting systematic reviews3.  
520 |a and to inform decisions about priorities for Cochrane methodology reviews Methods Methodology reviews were compiled by searching the Cochrane Methodology Register, the Cochrane Database of Methodology Reviews, and UK NHS HTA Methodology Reviews. Two reviewers identified potentially relevant reviews. These were retrieved and the same two reviewers assessed the relevance. Main results A total of twenty-eight methodology reviews were included covering sixteen topic areas. Thirty-one structured abstracts were prepared for the included reviews and a commentary was written for each topic area. Conclusions There are relatively few systematic methodology reviews and many of the included methodology reviews found a paucity of empirical evidence.