What quantitative and qualitative methods have been developed to measure community empowerment at a national level?

Community empowerment has been frequently studied at subnational levels but it is less clear how to measure it at a national level. Mixed methods approaches would be advantageous, using quantitative data from databases plus qualitative information to derive a range of variables and indicators. This...

Full description

Main Authors: Laverack, Glenn, Pratley, Pierre (Author)
Corporate Author: Health Evidence Network
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Copenhagen Health Evidence Network, WHO Regional Office for Europe 2018, [2018]
Series:Health evidence network synthesis report
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: National Center for Biotechnology Information - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02210nam a2200325 u 4500
001 EB001865414
003 EBX01000000000000001029494
005 00000000000000.0
007 tu|||||||||||||||||||||
008 190504 r ||| eng
020 |a 9789289053600 
100 1 |a Laverack, Glenn 
245 0 0 |a What quantitative and qualitative methods have been developed to measure community empowerment at a national level?  |h Elektronische Ressource  |c Glenn Laverack, Pierre Pratley 
260 |a Copenhagen  |b Health Evidence Network, WHO Regional Office for Europe  |c 2018, [2018] 
300 |a 1 PDF file (x, 34 pages)  |b illustrations 
505 0 |a Includes bibliographical references 
653 |a Research Design 
653 |a Qualitative Research 
653 |a Community Participation 
653 |a Delivery of Health Care 
700 1 |a Pratley, Pierre  |e [author] 
710 2 |a Health Evidence Network 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b NCBI  |a National Center for Biotechnology Information 
490 0 |a Health evidence network synthesis report 
856 |u https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534334  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 700 
082 0 |a 610 
520 |a Community empowerment has been frequently studied at subnational levels but it is less clear how to measure it at a national level. Mixed methods approaches would be advantageous, using quantitative data from databases plus qualitative information to derive a range of variables and indicators. This report identifies assessment methods that have been used and evidence for integrating qualitative and quantitative data for national assessments. When resources are limited or there is no current practice of measurement of community empowerment, the simplest approach is to combine a selection of quantitative variables and indicators available in statistical databases. When resources can be allocated, a more systematic approach would supplement such accessible data with some form of rapid qualitative assessment. Ideally, a formal national monitoring and evaluation system would be instituted that collects all the relevant quantitative and qualitative data and combines these into a regularly updated assessment