Health care spending and efficiency in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

In its 2013 budget request, the Obama administration sought $140 billion for the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), 54 percent of which would provide mandatory benefits, such as direct compensation and pensions, and 40 percent of which is discretionary spending, earmarked for medical benefits...

Full description

Main Author: Auerbach, David I.
Corporate Authors: RAND Health, Rand Corporation, Robert R. McCormick Foundation
Other Authors: Weeks, William B., Brantley, Ian
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Santa Monica, CA RAND 2013, 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: JSTOR Open Access Books - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 03302nam a2200457 u 4500
001 EB001843028
003 EBX01000000000000001007017
005 00000000000000.0
007 tu|||||||||||||||||||||
008 180730 r ||| eng
020 |z 0833080296 
020 |a 0833080296 
020 |z 9780833080295 
020 |a 9780833080295 
050 4 |a UB369 
100 1 |a Auerbach, David I. 
245 0 0 |a Health care spending and efficiency in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs  |h Elektronische Ressource  |c David I. Auerbach, William B. Weeks, and Ian Brantley 
246 3 1 |a Health care spending and efficiency in the United States Department of Veterans Affairs 
260 |a Santa Monica, CA  |b RAND  |c 2013, 2013 
300 |a 14 pages  |b color illustrations 
505 0 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 13-14) 
610 1 4 |a United States / Veterans Health Administration 
651 4 |a United States 
653 |a Veterans / Medical care / Management 
653 |a Expenditures, Public 
653 |a HISTORY / Military / General 
700 1 |a Weeks, William B. 
700 1 |a Brantley, Ian 
710 2 |a RAND Health 
710 2 |a Rand Corporation 
710 2 |a Robert R. McCormick Foundation 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b ZDB-39-JOA  |a JSTOR Open Access Books 
500 |a Caption title. - "RAND Corporation.". - "The research was conducted within RAND Health"--Back cover 
024 8 |a RAND/RR-285-MTF 
776 |z 0833083406 
776 |z 9780833083401 
856 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt5hhv36  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 362.86/8 
520 |a In its 2013 budget request, the Obama administration sought $140 billion for the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), 54 percent of which would provide mandatory benefits, such as direct compensation and pensions, and 40 percent of which is discretionary spending, earmarked for medical benefits under the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Unlike Medicare, which provides financing for care when its beneficiaries use providers throughout the U.S. health care system, the VHA is a government-run, parallel system that is primarily intended for care provision of veterans. The VHA hires its own doctors and has its own hospital network infrastructure. Although the VHA provides quality services to veterans, it does not preclude veterans from utilizing other forms of care outside of the VHA network--in fact, the majority of veterans' care is received external to the VHA because of location and other system limitations. Veterans typically use other private and public health insurance coverage (for example, Medicare, Medicaid) for external care, and many use both systems in a given year (dual use). Overlapping system use creates the potential for duplicative, uncoordinated, and inefficient use. The authors find some suggestive evidence of such inefficient use, particularly in the area of inpatient care. Coordination management and quality of care received by veterans across both VHA and private sector systems can be optimized (for example, in the area of mental illness, which benefits from an integrated approach across multiple providers and sectors), capitalizing on the best that each system has to offer, without increasing costs