|
|
|
|
LEADER |
04421nam a2200517 u 4500 |
001 |
EB001842357 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000001006346 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
tu||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
180730 r ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9786611430245
|
020 |
|
|
|z 0833041908
|
020 |
|
|
|a 0833041908
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9780833041906
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9780833041906
|
020 |
|
|
|a 1281430242
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9781281430243
|
020 |
|
|
|a 6611430245
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a UH723.U54
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Szayna, Thomas S.
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Preparing the Army for stability operations
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b doctrinal and interagency issues
|c Thomas S. Szayna, Derek Eaton, Amy Richardson
|
260 |
|
|
|a Santa Monica, CA
|b RAND Arroyo Center
|c ©2007©2007, 2007
|
300 |
|
|
|a xxviii, 247 pages
|b illustrations
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Cover; Preface; Contents; Figures; Tables; Summary; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; Chapter One -- Introduction; The Context; Objectives and Organization; Chapter Two -- Building Interagency Collaborative Capacity for SSTR Operations; Introduction; Main Directions in Rethinking of SSTR Operations; Issues in Implementating Guidelines for Rethinking SSTR Operations; Basic Dilemma; Current Stage of Building Interagency Collaborative Capacity for SSTR Operations; Conclusions; Chapter Three -- Army Doctrine in the Context of Interagency SSTR Operations; Introduction
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Includes bibliographical references (pages 241-247)
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Our Approach to Translating the ETMETM Security Sector Tasks Translated into Army Tactical Tasks; Establishing a Secure Environment; Miscellaneous ETM Essential Tasks; ETM Tasks That Do Not Fit into Existing ART Taxonomy; Gaps in the ETM; The Need for Common Definitions; Conclusions; Chapter Four -- Conclusions and Recommendations; Conclusions; Recommendations; Appendix A -- Field Manuals Referred to in Chapter Three; Appendix B -- The S/CRS Essential Tasks Matrix; Appendix C -- Consolidated Essential Tasks Matrix-to-AUTL List; Bibliography
|
610 |
1 |
4 |
|a United States / Army / Civic action
|
651 |
|
4 |
|a USA
|
651 |
|
4 |
|a United States / Armed Forces / Stability operations
|
651 |
|
4 |
|a United States / fast
|
653 |
|
|
|a TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Military Science
|
653 |
|
|
|a HISTORY / Military / Other
|
653 |
|
|
|a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Security (National & International)
|
653 |
|
|
|a Friedenssichernde Maßnahme
|
653 |
|
|
|a Wiederaufbau
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Eaton, Derek
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Richardson, Amy Frances
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b ZDB-39-JOA
|a JSTOR Open Access Books
|
500 |
|
|
|a "Prepared for the United States Army.". - "MG-646-A"--Page 4 of cover. - Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002
|
773 |
0 |
|
|t Books at JSTOR: Open Access
|
776 |
|
|
|z 0833044311
|
776 |
|
|
|z 9780833044310
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg646a
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 355.02/80973
|
520 |
|
|
|a "This monograph presents the results of a project entitled Improving Army Doctrine and Planning for Stability Operations. A great deal of activity has been aimed at revising the approach to the planning and implementation of Stabilization, Security, Transition, and Reconstruction (SSTR) operations. The primary emphasis of the changes is on ensuring a common U.S. strategy rather than a collection of individual departmental and agency efforts and on mobilizing and involving all available U.S. government assets in the effort. However, using a template to assess the extent of progress in building collaborative interagency capacity for SSTR operations, the authors find that some elements essential to the success of the process are not yet in place. They provide a series of recommendations on how the Army, as a major stakeholder, can act to advance the interagency process. The authors also assess the ongoing development of Army doctrine on SSTR operations and compare it to the emerging guidelines for SSTR operations at the interagency level. They provide specific recommendations for the Army to consider in revising its doctrine on SSTR operations, to bring it further in line with interagency guidelines. They also point out omissions in the security sector of the emerging interagency task list for SSTR operations."--Publisher's website
|