Preparing the Army for stability operations doctrinal and interagency issues

"This monograph presents the results of a project entitled Improving Army Doctrine and Planning for Stability Operations. A great deal of activity has been aimed at revising the approach to the planning and implementation of Stabilization, Security, Transition, and Reconstruction (SSTR) operati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Szayna, Thomas S.
Other Authors: Eaton, Derek, Richardson, Amy Frances
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Santa Monica, CA RAND Arroyo Center ©2007©2007, 2007
Subjects:
Usa
Online Access:
Collection: JSTOR Open Access Books - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 04421nam a2200517 u 4500
001 EB001842357
003 EBX01000000000000001006346
005 00000000000000.0
007 tu|||||||||||||||||||||
008 180730 r ||| eng
020 |a 9786611430245 
020 |z 0833041908 
020 |a 0833041908 
020 |z 9780833041906 
020 |a 9780833041906 
020 |a 1281430242 
020 |a 9781281430243 
020 |a 6611430245 
050 4 |a UH723.U54 
100 1 |a Szayna, Thomas S. 
245 0 0 |a Preparing the Army for stability operations  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b doctrinal and interagency issues  |c Thomas S. Szayna, Derek Eaton, Amy Richardson 
260 |a Santa Monica, CA  |b RAND Arroyo Center  |c ©2007©2007, 2007 
300 |a xxviii, 247 pages  |b illustrations 
505 0 |a Cover; Preface; Contents; Figures; Tables; Summary; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; Chapter One -- Introduction; The Context; Objectives and Organization; Chapter Two -- Building Interagency Collaborative Capacity for SSTR Operations; Introduction; Main Directions in Rethinking of SSTR Operations; Issues in Implementating Guidelines for Rethinking SSTR Operations; Basic Dilemma; Current Stage of Building Interagency Collaborative Capacity for SSTR Operations; Conclusions; Chapter Three -- Army Doctrine in the Context of Interagency SSTR Operations; Introduction 
505 0 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 241-247) 
505 0 |a Our Approach to Translating the ETMETM Security Sector Tasks Translated into Army Tactical Tasks; Establishing a Secure Environment; Miscellaneous ETM Essential Tasks; ETM Tasks That Do Not Fit into Existing ART Taxonomy; Gaps in the ETM; The Need for Common Definitions; Conclusions; Chapter Four -- Conclusions and Recommendations; Conclusions; Recommendations; Appendix A -- Field Manuals Referred to in Chapter Three; Appendix B -- The S/CRS Essential Tasks Matrix; Appendix C -- Consolidated Essential Tasks Matrix-to-AUTL List; Bibliography 
610 1 4 |a United States / Army / Civic action 
651 4 |a USA 
651 4 |a United States / Armed Forces / Stability operations 
651 4 |a United States / fast 
653 |a TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Military Science 
653 |a HISTORY / Military / Other 
653 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Security (National & International) 
653 |a Friedenssichernde Maßnahme 
653 |a Wiederaufbau 
700 1 |a Eaton, Derek 
700 1 |a Richardson, Amy Frances 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b ZDB-39-JOA  |a JSTOR Open Access Books 
500 |a "Prepared for the United States Army.". - "MG-646-A"--Page 4 of cover. - Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002 
773 0 |t Books at JSTOR: Open Access 
776 |z 0833044311 
776 |z 9780833044310 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg646a  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 355.02/80973 
520 |a "This monograph presents the results of a project entitled Improving Army Doctrine and Planning for Stability Operations. A great deal of activity has been aimed at revising the approach to the planning and implementation of Stabilization, Security, Transition, and Reconstruction (SSTR) operations. The primary emphasis of the changes is on ensuring a common U.S. strategy rather than a collection of individual departmental and agency efforts and on mobilizing and involving all available U.S. government assets in the effort. However, using a template to assess the extent of progress in building collaborative interagency capacity for SSTR operations, the authors find that some elements essential to the success of the process are not yet in place. They provide a series of recommendations on how the Army, as a major stakeholder, can act to advance the interagency process. The authors also assess the ongoing development of Army doctrine on SSTR operations and compare it to the emerging guidelines for SSTR operations at the interagency level. They provide specific recommendations for the Army to consider in revising its doctrine on SSTR operations, to bring it further in line with interagency guidelines. They also point out omissions in the security sector of the emerging interagency task list for SSTR operations."--Publisher's website