|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02129nam a2200421 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB001842291 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000001006280 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
tu||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
180730 r ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|z 9781598753585
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781598753585
|
| 020 |
|
|
|z 0833034200
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0833034200
|
| 020 |
|
|
|z 9780833034205
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780833034205
|
| 020 |
|
|
|z 1598753584
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 1598753584
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a R853.O87
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Damberg, Cheryl
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Evaluating the feasibility of developing national outcomes data bases to assist patients with making treatment decisions
|h Elektronische Ressource
|c Cheryl L. Damberg [and others]
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Santa Monica
|b Rand Corp.
|c 2003, 2003
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a a review of the literature -- Prostate cancer data base feasibility assessment -- Osteoarthritis data base feasibility assessment -- Conclusions and recommendations -- Appendix A. Draft questions-Prostate cancer consultative meeting, March 22, 2002 -- Appendix B. Draft questions-Arthritis consultative meeting, March 13, 2002 -- Appendix C. Prostate cancer meeting participants -- Appendix D. Arthritis meeting participants
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Includes bibliographical references (pages 125-131)
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a United States
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Outcome assessment (Medical care)
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Patient education
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a MEDICAL / Health Policy
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b ZDB-39-JOA
|a JSTOR Open Access Books
|
| 024 |
8 |
|
|a RAND/MR-1708-AHRQ
|
| 776 |
|
|
|z 9780833057181
|
| 776 |
|
|
|z 0833057189
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mr1708ahrq
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 362.1/0285
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This report examines issues surrounding the establishment of a national patient outcomes database that would be used by patients and providers to make more informed treatment decisions. It focuses on prostate cancer and surgery for osteoarthritis. The authors conclude that such longitudinal databases would be both desirable and feasible but would require substantial resources
|