|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02186nam a2200373 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB001842101 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000001006090 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
tu||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
180730 r ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|z 0874212928
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0874212928
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 1283266792
|
| 020 |
|
|
|z 9780874212921
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780874212921
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781283266796
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a PE1404
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Johanek, Cindy
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Composing research
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b a contextualist paradigm for rhetoric and composition
|c Cindy Johanek
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Logan, Utah
|b Utah State University Press
|c ©2000©2000, 2000
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 229 pages
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Composition research : issues in context -- Research in composition : current issues and a brief history -- Numbers, narratives, and He vs. She : issues of audience in composition research -- From epistemology to epistemic justification : toward a contextualist research paradigm -- A contextualist research paradigm : an illustration (including reprint of :Writing Quality of Seventh, Ninth, and Eleventh Graders, and college Freshman," by Eileen I. Oliver) -- A contextualist research paradigm : a demonstration -- Predictor variables : the future of composition research
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Includes bibliographical references (pages 215-225) and index
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Rhetoric
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a REFERENCE / Writing Skills
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Composition & Creative Writing
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b ZDB-39-JOA
|a JSTOR Open Access Books
|
| 015 |
|
|
|a GBC158919
|
| 776 |
|
|
|z 0874213223
|
| 776 |
|
|
|z 9780874213225
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt46nrtw
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 808/.042/071
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a In Composing Research, Cindy Johanek offers a new perspective on the ideological conflict between qualitative and quantitative research approaches, and the theories of knowledge that inform them. With a paradigm that is sensitive to the context of one's research questions, she argues, scholars can develop less dichotomous forms that invoke the strengths of both research traditions
|