|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02346nmm a2200397 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB001270026 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000884668 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
161125 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780230299405
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Shields, Stuart
|e [editor]
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Critical International Political Economy
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b Dialogue, Debate and Dissensus
|c edited by Stuart Shields, Ian Bruff, Huw Macartney
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a London
|b Palgrave Macmillan UK
|c 2011, 2011
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a XIII, 195 p
|b online resource
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Political Economy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Political Theory
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Political philosophy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Political Science and International Relations
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International Relations
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Political theory
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Political economy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Political Philosophy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Political Science
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Political History
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Political science
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a World politics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International relations
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Bruff, Ian
|e [editor]
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Macartney, Huw
|e [editor]
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b Springer
|a Springer eBooks 2005-
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a International Political Economy Series
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230299405?nosfx=y
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 339.5
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Amidst the continued debate surrounding the foundations of IPE and recent methodological and theoretical divides, the authors argue that an attempt should be made to re-visit the notion of the 'critical'. They assess the development of so-called critical IPE and interrogate whether the theoretical foundations it was built upon have reached their potential. This challenge is taken up in a number of different ways, but all share a common concern: to re-assess the purpose of critical approaches and to reflect on why certain social theorists have been favoured as a point of departure, yet others have largely been ignored. In light of recent debates on the notion of a 'trans-Atlantic divide' within IPE, this book demonstrates how the distinction between the 'critical' and the 'orthodox' (or 'empirical') is only significant if the 'critical' is geared towards a larger, more substantial body of critical social enquiry and engages with what it means to conduct such enquiry
|