A legal and constitutional argument against the alleged judicial right of restraining the publication of reports of judicial proceedings as assumed in the King v. Thistlewood and others, enforced against the proprietor of the Observer by a fine of £500, and afterwards confirmed by the Court of King's Bench

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thomas, John Penford
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: London Printed by I.L. Turner, for S. Sweet 1822, 1822
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Making of Modern Law / Legal Treatises - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 01358nmm a2200253 u 4500
001 EB000960756
003 EBX01000000000000000754346
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 150318 ||| eng
100 1 |a Thomas, John Penford 
245 0 0 |a A legal and constitutional argument against the alleged judicial right of restraining the publication of reports of judicial proceedings  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b as assumed in the King v. Thistlewood and others, enforced against the proprietor of the Observer by a fine of £500, and afterwards confirmed by the Court of King's Bench  |c by J.P. Thomas 
260 |a London  |b Printed by I.L. Turner, for S. Sweet  |c 1822, 1822 
300 |a Online-Ressource  |c 24 cm 
538 |a Full text online 
600 1 4 |a Clement, William Innell / d. 1852 / Trials, litigation, etc 
600 1 4 |a Thistlewood, Arthur / 1770-1820 / Trials, litigation, etc 
653 |a Observer (London, England) 
653 |a Freedom of the press / Great Britain 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b ZDB-1-MML  |a Making of Modern Law / Legal Treatises 
500 |a Includes bibliographical references. - OCLC, 32598581. - Reproduction of original from Harvard Law School Library 
856 4 0 |u http://nl.sub.uni-goettingen.de/id/19007926200?origin=/collection/nlh-mml  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 340