Surveillance and identification of signals for updating systematic reviews implementation and early experience
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Between June 2011 and June 2012, we established a surveillance process and completed the evaluation of 14 CERs. Of the 14 CERs, 2 were classified as high priority, 3 as medium priority, and 9 as low priority. Of the 6 CERs released prior to 2010 (meaning over 18 months befor...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Corporate Authors: | , |
Format: | eBook |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Rockville (MD)
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US)
2013, June 2013
|
Series: | Methods research report
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | |
Collection: | National Center for Biotechnology Information - Collection details see MPG.ReNa |
Table of Contents:
- Includes bibliographical references