Comparison of translational patterns in two nutrient-disease associations

BACKGROUND: There are several examples in nutrition of discordance between the results of observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We hypothesized that this discordance is attributable to differences in the translational paths of nutrient-disease associations. Translational pat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Trikalinos, Thomas A.
Corporate Authors: United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Tufts Evidence-based Practice Center
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Rockville, MD U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [2011], 2011
Series:Technical review
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: National Center for Biotechnology Information - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 03536nam a2200373 u 4500
001 EB000943344
003 EBX01000000000000000736934
005 00000000000000.0
007 tu|||||||||||||||||||||
008 150223 r ||| eng
100 1 |a Trikalinos, Thomas A. 
245 0 0 |a Comparison of translational patterns in two nutrient-disease associations  |h Elektronische Ressource  |c prepared for Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ; prepared by Tufts Medical Center Evidence-based Practice Center ; investigators, Thomas A Trikalinos ... [et al.] 
260 |a Rockville, MD  |b U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality  |c [2011], 2011 
300 |a 1 PDF file (various pagings)  |b ill 
505 0 |a Includes bibliographical references 
653 |a Biomedical Research / methods 
653 |a United States 
653 |a Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic 
653 |a Translational Medical Research / methods 
653 |a Nutritional Physiological Phenomena 
653 |a Cardiovascular Diseases / mortality 
653 |a Evidence-Based Medicine 
653 |a Cardiovascular Diseases / drug therapy 
653 |a Vitamin E / therapeutic use 
653 |a Fatty Acids, Omega-3 / therapeutic use 
710 2 |a United States  |b Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 
710 2 |a Tufts Evidence-based Practice Center 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b NCBI  |a National Center for Biotechnology Information 
490 0 |a Technical review 
500 |a "October 2011." 
856 4 0 |u https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK82526  |3 Volltext  |n NLM Bookshelf Books  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 610 
520 |a BACKGROUND: There are several examples in nutrition of discordance between the results of observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We hypothesized that this discordance is attributable to differences in the translational paths of nutrient-disease associations. Translational paths can be assessed using citation analysis. OBJECTIVE: We set out to empirically explore our hypothesis by analyzing and comparing characteristics of the citation networks in two nutritional associations with disease: one where the two research designs generally agree and one where they disagree. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We compared the characteristics of citation networks using examples where RCTs and observational studies agreed (long chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids [n-3 PUFA]) or disagreed (vitamin E). We performed systematic reviews in each example, constructed citation networks, and compared them with respect to the number of articles and citation relationships between them, as well as the distribution of articles' hub and authority scores. RESULTS: For n-3 PUFA, meta-analyses of 14 RCTs and 10 observational studies both suggested that higher intake was associated with lower cardiovascular mortality. For vitamin E, the meta-analysis of 14 RCTs excluded a clinically significant effect, whereas 14 observational studies reported a significant inverse association. The respective citation networks consisted of 392 (n-3 PUFA) and 351 (vitamin E) articles. No differences between the characteristics of the two networks were identified. There was no evidence that observational studies predated RCTs in the translational process in either example. CONCLUSION: In the two examples, citation network characteristics do not predict concordance in the results of observational studies and RCTs