Identifying signals for updating systematic reviews : a comparison of two methods

Both methods alone or in combination may be considered as appropriate tools. Future research would confirm these conclusions for a larger cohort of reviews and assess the predictive validity of the methods with actual updates

Main Author: Shekelle, Paul G.
Corporate Authors: United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Southern California Evidence-Based Practice Center/RAND., Tufts Evidence-based Practice Center, University of Ottawa Evidence-based Practice Center
Format: eBook
Published: Rockville, MD Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [2011], 2011
Series:Methods research report
Online Access:
Collection: National Center for Biotechnology Information - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
Table of Contents:
  • Includes bibliographical references