|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02551nmm a2200601 u 4500 |
001 |
EB000932328 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000000725924 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
150128 ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9781451844078
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Saito, Mika
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Trade Patterns Among Industrial Countries
|b Their Relationship to Technology Differences and Capital Mobility
|c Mika Saito
|
260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2004
|
300 |
|
|
|a 31 pages
|
651 |
|
4 |
|a United States
|
653 |
|
|
|a Manufacturing industries
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labor costs
|
653 |
|
|
|a Balance of trade
|
653 |
|
|
|a Research and Development
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labour
|
653 |
|
|
|a Intellectual Property Rights: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Technology
|
653 |
|
|
|a Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Model Evaluation and Selection
|
653 |
|
|
|a Cost
|
653 |
|
|
|a Capital and Total Factor Productivity
|
653 |
|
|
|a Production
|
653 |
|
|
|a Trade balance
|
653 |
|
|
|a Manufacturing
|
653 |
|
|
|a General issues
|
653 |
|
|
|a Exports and Imports
|
653 |
|
|
|a International economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Economic sectors
|
653 |
|
|
|a Industry Studies: Manufacturing: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labor
|
653 |
|
|
|a Model Construction and Estimation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Industries: Manufacturing
|
653 |
|
|
|a International trade
|
653 |
|
|
|a Innovation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Comparative advantage
|
653 |
|
|
|a Technological Change
|
653 |
|
|
|a Capacity
|
653 |
|
|
|a Empirical Studies of Trade
|
653 |
|
|
|a Income economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Neoclassical Models of Trade
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451844078.001
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2004/023/001.2004.issue-023-en.xml?cid=17090-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
520 |
|
|
|a This paper compares two alternative measures of technology differences across industrial countries during 1970-92: one measures differences in labor productivity (the Ricardian measure), and the other differences in total factor productivity (the Hicksian measure). The distinction between the two measures is important to the extent that trade patterns are inconsistent with comparative advantage revealed by the Hicksian measure, but not necessarily with that by the Ricardian measure. The distinction becomes more important in the period with high capital mobility across countries
|