|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02113nmm a2200481 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000929558 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000723154 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
150128 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781451843897
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Verhoeven, Marijn
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Does Higher Government Spending Buy Better Results in Education and Health Care?
|c Marijn Verhoeven, Sanjeev Gupta, Erwin Tiongson
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 1999
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 25 pages
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Health
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public finance & taxation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a National Government Expenditures and Health
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Health care spending
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a National Government Expenditures and Education
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Regulation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Education spending
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Health Behavior
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Education
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Health economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Expenditure
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Health: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Education: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Expenditures, Public
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public Health
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a General Welfare
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public Finance
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Health: Government Policy
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Gupta, Sanjeev
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Tiongson, Erwin
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451843897.001
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/1999/021/001.1999.issue-021-en.xml?cid=2892-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a There is little empirical evidence to support the claim that public spending improves education and health indicators. This paper uses cross-sectional data for 50 developing and transition countries to show that expenditure allocations within the two social sectors improve both access to and attainment in schools and reduce mortality rates for infants and children. The size and efficiency of these allocations are important for promoting equity and furthering second-generation reforms
|