|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02654nmm a2200601 u 4500 |
001 |
EB000929078 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000000722674 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
150128 ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9781451843620
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Coe, David
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Are There International R&D Spillovers Among Randomly Matched Trade Partners? A Response to Keller
|c David Coe, Willy Hoffmaister
|
260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 1999
|
300 |
|
|
|a 21 pages
|
651 |
|
4 |
|a United States
|
653 |
|
|
|a Industrial productivity
|
653 |
|
|
|a Investments: Stocks
|
653 |
|
|
|a Stocks
|
653 |
|
|
|a Trade: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Production and Operations Management
|
653 |
|
|
|a Empirical Studies of Trade
|
653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Balance of trade
|
653 |
|
|
|a Imports
|
653 |
|
|
|a Institutional Investors
|
653 |
|
|
|a International Trade Organizations
|
653 |
|
|
|a Exports and Imports
|
653 |
|
|
|a Trade Policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Non-bank Financial Institutions
|
653 |
|
|
|a Cost
|
653 |
|
|
|a International trade
|
653 |
|
|
|a Investment & securities
|
653 |
|
|
|a Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies
|
653 |
|
|
|a International economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Total factor productivity
|
653 |
|
|
|a Production
|
653 |
|
|
|a Simulation Methods
|
653 |
|
|
|a Pension Funds
|
653 |
|
|
|a Trade balance
|
653 |
|
|
|a Financial institutions
|
653 |
|
|
|a Financial Instruments
|
653 |
|
|
|a Plurilateral trade
|
653 |
|
|
|a Capital and Total Factor Productivity
|
653 |
|
|
|a Capacity
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Hoffmaister, Willy
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451843620.001
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/1999/018/001.1999.issue-018-en.xml?cid=2890-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
520 |
|
|
|a Keller (1998) reexamines Coe and Helpman’s (1995) analysis of international R&D spillovers focusing on the weights used to define the foreign R&D capital stock. Keller creates “random” weights and shows that they give rise to positive estimates of international R&D spillovers, casting doubts on the robustness of Coe and Helpman’s findings. We show that Keller’s “random” weights are essentially simple averages with a random error. We derive alternative random weights and present regressions showing that when they are used to define the foreign R&D capital stock, the estimated international R&D spillover estimates are nonexistent, as would be expected
|