Consensus Forecasts and Inefficient Information Aggregation

Consensus forecasts are inefficient, over-weighting older information already in the public domain at the expense of new private information, when individual forecasters have different information sets. Using a cross-country panel of growth forecasts and new methodological insights, this paper finds...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Crowe, Christopher
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Washington, D.C. International Monetary Fund 2010
Series:IMF Working Papers
Subjects:
Wp
Online Access:
Collection: International Monetary Fund - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 01647nmm a2200301 u 4500
001 EB000927795
003 EBX01000000000000000721391
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 150128 ||| eng
020 |a 9781455201891 
100 1 |a Crowe, Christopher 
245 0 0 |a Consensus Forecasts and Inefficient Information Aggregation  |c Christopher Crowe 
260 |a Washington, D.C.  |b International Monetary Fund  |c 2010 
300 |a 43 pages 
651 4 |a United States 
653 |a WP 
653 |a Math 
653 |a Information Aggregation 
653 |a Table 
653 |a Consensus Forecasts 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b IMF  |a International Monetary Fund 
490 0 |a IMF Working Papers 
028 5 0 |a 10.5089/9781455201891.001 
856 4 0 |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2010/178/001.2010.issue-178-en.xml  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 330 
520 |a Consensus forecasts are inefficient, over-weighting older information already in the public domain at the expense of new private information, when individual forecasters have different information sets. Using a cross-country panel of growth forecasts and new methodological insights, this paper finds that: consensus forecasts are inefficient as predicted; this is not due to individual forecaster irrationality; forecasters appear unaware of this inefficiency; and a simple adjustment reduces forecast errors by 5 percent. Similar results are found using US nominal GDP forecasts. The paper also discusses the result's implications for users of forecaster surveys and for the literature on information aggregation