|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02149nmm a2200457 u 4500 |
001 |
EB000924916 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000000718512 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
150128 ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9781451943146
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Model Uncertainty. Learning, and the Gains from Coordination
|
260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 1988
|
300 |
|
|
|a 38 pages
|
651 |
|
4 |
|a United States
|
653 |
|
|
|a Inflation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Foreign exchange
|
653 |
|
|
|a Exchange rates
|
653 |
|
|
|a Prices
|
653 |
|
|
|a Price Level
|
653 |
|
|
|a Foreign Exchange
|
653 |
|
|
|a Money
|
653 |
|
|
|a Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Floating exchange rates
|
653 |
|
|
|a Monetary base
|
653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Money and Monetary Policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Demand for Money
|
653 |
|
|
|a Monetary economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Currency
|
653 |
|
|
|a Deflation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Demand for money
|
653 |
|
|
|a Money supply
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a International Monetary Fund
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451943146.001
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/1988/114/001.1988.issue-114-en.xml?cid=27530-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
520 |
|
|
|a The paper considers gains from international economic policy coordination when there is uncertainty concerning the functioning of the world economy, but also learning about the “true” model on the part of policymakers. The paper reports estimates of plausible alternative versions of a standard, two-country model. Activist policy (either coordinated or uncoordinated) may produce large welfare losses in the absence of learning, if policymakers believe in the wrong model; hence exogenous money targets and freely flexible exchange rates may be best. However, model learning (from observations on macroeconomic variables) causes coordinated policies to dominate activist uncoordinated policies or exogenous money targets
|