|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02579nmm a2200625 u 4500 |
001 |
EB000924788 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000000718384 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
150128 ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9781475510553
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Hasanov, Fuad
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Public Debt Dynamics
|b The Effects of Austerity, Inflation, and Growth Shocks
|c Fuad Hasanov, Reda Cherif
|
260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2012
|
300 |
|
|
|a 28 pages
|
651 |
|
4 |
|a United States
|
653 |
|
|
|a Fiscal stance
|
653 |
|
|
|a Inflation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Public debt
|
653 |
|
|
|a Econometric analysis
|
653 |
|
|
|a Dynamic Treatment Effect Models
|
653 |
|
|
|a Public finance & taxation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Deflation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Debt Management
|
653 |
|
|
|a Fiscal Policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Debts, Public
|
653 |
|
|
|a Debt
|
653 |
|
|
|a Exports and Imports
|
653 |
|
|
|a Diffusion Processes
|
653 |
|
|
|a Fiscal policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a International Lending and Debt Problems
|
653 |
|
|
|a International economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a External debt
|
653 |
|
|
|a Debts, External
|
653 |
|
|
|a Vector autoregression
|
653 |
|
|
|a Time-Series Models
|
653 |
|
|
|a Sovereign Debt
|
653 |
|
|
|a Price Level
|
653 |
|
|
|a Prices
|
653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Econometrics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Dynamic Quantile Regressions
|
653 |
|
|
|a National Budget, Deficit, and Debt: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Econometrics & economic statistics
|
653 |
|
|
|a State Space Models
|
653 |
|
|
|a Public Finance
|
653 |
|
|
|a Debt sustainability analysis
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Cherif, Reda
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781475510553.001
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2012/230/001.2012.issue-230-en.xml?cid=26268-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
520 |
|
|
|a We study how macroeconomic shocks affect U.S. public debt dynamics using a VAR with debt feedback. Following a fiscal austerity shock, the debt ratio initially declines and then returns to its pre-shock path. Yet, the effect is not statistically significant. In a weak economic environment, the likelihood of a self-defeating austerity shock is much higher than in normal times. An inflation shock only slightly reduces the debt ratio for a few quarters. A positive growth shock unambiguously lowers debt. In our specification, the debt ratio is stationary, whereas a VAR excluding debt may imply an explosive debt path
|