Rethinking Economic Growth Theory From a Biophysical Perspective

Neoclassical growth theory is the dominant perspective for explaining economic growth. At its core are four implicit assumptions: 1) economic output can become decoupled from energy consumption; 2) economic distribution is unrelated to growth; 3) large institutions are not important for growth; and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fix, Blair
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 2015, 2015
Edition:1st ed. 2015
Series:Energy Analysis
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Springer eBooks 2005- - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02741nmm a2200361 u 4500
001 EB000913681
003 EBX01000000000000000709577
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 150107 ||| eng
020 |a 9783319128269 
100 1 |a Fix, Blair 
245 0 0 |a Rethinking Economic Growth Theory From a Biophysical Perspective  |h Elektronische Ressource  |c by Blair Fix 
250 |a 1st ed. 2015 
260 |a Cham  |b Springer International Publishing  |c 2015, 2015 
300 |a XII, 125 p. 39 illus., 32 illus. in color  |b online resource 
505 0 |a Introduction.- Decoupling.- Distribution.- Institutional Size.- Labor Structure -- Towards a Biophysical Growth Theory -- Appendix: US Sectors: Methodology and Sources 
653 |a Data-driven Science, Modeling and Theory Building 
653 |a Environmental Economics 
653 |a Sociophysics 
653 |a Environmental economics 
653 |a Econophysics 
653 |a Economic Growth 
653 |a Economic growth 
653 |a Energy Policy, Economics and Management 
653 |a Energy policy 
653 |a Energy and state 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b Springer  |a Springer eBooks 2005- 
490 0 |a Energy Analysis 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12826-9?nosfx=y  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 338.9 
520 |a Neoclassical growth theory is the dominant perspective for explaining economic growth. At its core are four implicit assumptions: 1) economic output can become decoupled from energy consumption; 2) economic distribution is unrelated to growth; 3) large institutions are not important for growth; and 4) labor force structure is not important for growth. Drawing on a wide range of data from the economic history of the United States, this book tests the validity of these assumptions and finds no empirical support. Instead, connections are found between the growth in energy consumption and such disparate phenomena as economic redistribution, corporate employment concentration, and changing labor force structure. The integration of energy into an economic growth model has the potential to offer insight into the future effects of fossil fuel depletion on key macroeconomic indicators, which is already manifested in stalled or diminished growth and escalating debt in many national economies. This book argues for an alternative, biophysical perspective to the study of growth, and presents a  set of "stylized facts" that such an approach must successfully explain. Aspects of biophysical analysis are combined with differential monetary analysis to arrive at a unique empirical methodology for investigating the elements and dependencies of the economic growth process