|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01188nmm a2200277 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000726342 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000579424 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
180413 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780199895236
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0199895236
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a K260
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Kelman, Mark
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a The heuristics debate
|h Elektronische Ressource
|c Mark Kelman
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a New York
|b Oxford University Press
|c 2011, 2011
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Includes bibliographical references and index
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Effectiveness and validity of law
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Heuristic
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Law / Methodology
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b OUP
|a Oxford University Press
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199755608.001.0001?nosfx=y
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 340.1'1
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a All of use heuristics - that is, we reach conclusions using shorthand cues without utilizing or analyzing all of the available information at hand. Here, Kelman takes a step back from the chaos of competing academic debates to consider the wealth of knowledge that a more expansive use of heuristics can open up
|