Losing twice harms of indifference in the Supreme Court

Constitutional 'losers' represent a thorny and longstanding problem in American constitutional law. Here, Emily Calhoun draws upon conflict resolution theory, political theory, and Habermasian discourse theory to argue that in such cases, the Court must work harder to avoid inflicting unne...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Calhoun, Emily M.
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: New York Oxford University Press 2011, 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Oxford University Press - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 01344nmm a2200289 u 4500
001 EB000726049
003 EBX01000000000000000579131
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 180413 ||| eng
020 |a 9780199894444 
020 |a 0199894442 
050 4 |a KF8748 
100 1 |a Calhoun, Emily M. 
245 0 0 |a Losing twice  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b harms of indifference in the Supreme Court  |c Emily M. Calhoun 
260 |a New York  |b Oxford University Press  |c 2011, 2011 
300 |a 1 online resource 
505 0 |a Includes bibliographical references and index 
610 1 4 |a United States / Supreme Court / Decision making 
653 |a Equality before the law / United States 
653 |a Apathy 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b OUP  |a Oxford University Press 
028 5 0 |a 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195399745.001.0001 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195399745.001.0001?nosfx=y  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 347.7'326 
520 |a Constitutional 'losers' represent a thorny and longstanding problem in American constitutional law. Here, Emily Calhoun draws upon conflict resolution theory, political theory, and Habermasian discourse theory to argue that in such cases, the Court must work harder to avoid inflicting unnecessary harm on Constitutional losers