A Paradigm Theory of Existence : Onto-Theology Vindicated

The heart of philosophy is metaphysics, and at the heart of the heart lie two questions about existence. What is it for any contingent thing to exist? Why does any contingent thing exist? Call these the nature question and the ground question, respectively. The first concerns the nature of the exist...

Full description

Main Author: Vallicella, W.F.
Corporate Author: SpringerLink (Online service)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 2002, 2002
Edition:1st ed. 2002
Series:Philosophical Studies Series
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Springer Book Archives -2004 - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02925nmm a2200385 u 4500
001 EB000721825
003 EBX01000000000000000574907
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 140122 ||| eng
020 |a 9789401705882 
100 1 |a Vallicella, W.F. 
245 0 0 |a A Paradigm Theory of Existence  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b Onto-Theology Vindicated  |c by W.F. Vallicella 
250 |a 1st ed. 2002 
260 |a Dordrecht  |b Springer Netherlands  |c 2002, 2002 
300 |a XII, 286 p  |b online resource 
505 0 |a I The Idea of a Paradigm Theory of Existence -- II Is Existence a First-Level Property? -- III The ‘No Difference’ Theory -- IV IS Existence a Property of Properties? -- V Mondial Attribute Theories -- VI The Ontology of the Contingent Existent -- VII The Ground of the Contingent Existent -- VIII The Paradigm Existent -- References 
653 |a Metaphysics 
653 |a Ontology 
653 |a Modern philosophy 
653 |a Religious Studies, general 
653 |a Philosophy 
653 |a Ontology 
653 |a Modern Philosophy 
653 |a Philosophy, general 
653 |a Metaphysics 
653 |a Religion 
710 2 |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b SBA  |a Springer Book Archives -2004 
490 0 |a Philosophical Studies Series 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0588-2?nosfx=y  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 110 
520 |a The heart of philosophy is metaphysics, and at the heart of the heart lie two questions about existence. What is it for any contingent thing to exist? Why does any contingent thing exist? Call these the nature question and the ground question, respectively. The first concerns the nature of the existence of the contingent existent; the second concerns the ground of the contingent existent. Both questions are ancient, and yet perennial in their appeal; both have presided over the burial of so many of their would-be undertakers that it is a good induction that they will continue to do so. For some time now, the preferred style in addressing such questions has been deflationary when it has not been eliminativist. Ask Willard Quine what existence is, and you will hear that "Existence is what existential quantification expresses. "! Ask Bertrand Russell what it is for an individual to exist, and he will tell you that an individual can no more exist than it can be numerous: there 2 just is no such thing as the existence of individuals. And of course Russell's eliminativist answer implies that one cannot even ask, on pain of succumbing to the fallacy of complex question, why any contingent individual exists: if no individual exists, there can be no question why any individual exists. Not to mention Russell's modal corollary: 'contingent' and 'necessary' can only be said de dicto (of propositions) and not de re (of things)