Analysis of Dis/agreement - with particular reference to Law and Legal Theory

In order to determine whether two participants in a discussion are in real dis/agreement, one must compare their propositions. Comparison presupposes yardsticks in common. Analysis of Dis/agreement thematises such yardsticks, in that it demonstrates the existence, content and factual significance of...

Full description

Main Author: Eng, S.
Corporate Author: SpringerLink (Online service)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 2003, 2003
Edition:1st ed. 2003
Series:Law and Philosophy Library
Subjects:
Law
Online Access:
Collection: Springer Book Archives -2004 - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02440nmm a2200385 u 4500
001 EB000721735
003 EBX01000000000000000574817
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 140122 ||| eng
020 |a 9789401703819 
100 1 |a Eng, S. 
245 0 0 |a Analysis of Dis/agreement - with particular reference to Law and Legal Theory  |h Elektronische Ressource  |c by S. Eng 
250 |a 1st ed. 2003 
260 |a Dordrecht  |b Springer Netherlands  |c 2003, 2003 
300 |a XXI, 610 p  |b online resource 
505 0 |a A Distinct and Widespread Combination of the Fundamental Proposition Types -- I?V Conclusion -- Literature referred to -- Index of authors -- Index of subjects 
653 |a Philosophy of Law 
653 |a Law 
653 |a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History 
653 |a Philosophy 
653 |a Criminology and Criminal Justice, general 
653 |a Political Science 
653 |a Criminology 
653 |a Law—Philosophy 
653 |a Philosophy, general 
653 |a Political science 
710 2 |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b SBA  |a Springer Book Archives -2004 
490 0 |a Law and Philosophy Library 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0381-9?nosfx=y  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 100 
520 |a In order to determine whether two participants in a discussion are in real dis/agreement, one must compare their propositions. Comparison presupposes yardsticks in common. Analysis of Dis/agreement thematises such yardsticks, in that it demonstrates the existence, content and factual significance of a relatively well-delimited set of proposition types and proposition patterns, with their accompanying tenability criteria and motivating interests. The book is a work in the field of legal theory by virtue of its demonstrating how lawyers' power of judgement is constituted in and through these yardsticks. The book is interdisciplinary by virtue of its demonstrating how the same yardsticks come into play more generally in argumentation formulated in everyday language, i.e. independently of law. And the book is a work in the field of philosophy by virtue of its demonstrating the existence and factual significance of language and argumentation actions with a certain independence in relation to the level of controversial fundamental philosophical positions